Why do I get the feeling Brook vs Spence is going to..........?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by james5000, May 24, 2017.


  1. RoughD

    RoughD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,687
    99
    Jun 29, 2006
    I like Spences bodywork when he has his opponent retreating on the ropes or when he's roughing them up on the inside, but he leaves himself way open to counters especially the uppercut and that's kells money punch.
     
    Angler Andrew likes this.
  2. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,269
    Jun 28, 2016
    I used to give Brook stick before I realised he was a yes man,I agree and like all 50/50 fights it will deliver,only one match up that was hyped up this year and failed was Canelo v Chavez because it was nowhere near 50/50 and it showed.
     
  3. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,261
    16,355
    Dec 6, 2008
    Me too. I didn't enjoy a lot of Floyd's fight but if people couldn't hit him, that's their problem.
     
  4. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    Its also very telling about Spence. If guys who can move doesnt bother you why even mention this? If im Brook i stay on the move and box Spences ears off. You dont fight your opponents fight.
     
  5. Gil Gonzalez

    Gil Gonzalez Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,607
    2,862
    Jun 15, 2012
    It's funny you are trying to make it sound like you've somehow refuted anything I've said to save face on this forum. It is dishonest. Also your ad hominem attacks on me just show your frustration. None of this reflects well on you. You would be better off just saying we disagree. You've refuted nothing.

    And you haven't shown any bias on my part, which is another ad hominem attack, because there is no bias to show.

    All my opinions still stand, and will become obvious over time to anyone who uses their own eyes. I don't need Keith Thurman or Compubox to tell me what I am seeing.