Why do Idiots think Floyd Mayweather had more talented than a prime Roberto Duran?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rossco666, Dec 29, 2015.


  1. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    He looked good against those guys because........they aren't Floyd dummy, not because of weight. Hatton rehydrated heavier Mayweather anyway so that excuse is null and void.
     
  2. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Now you're running away to talk about a different point and using that point to say how the 'excuse' is 'null and void'. Terrible stuff I'm reading here.

    They aren't Floyd, but on an eye test you can see Hatton was sharp and back with a vengeance, and if Hatton was short of being very good, a 2010 Malignaggi would have put up a big fight.

    Pac fought a sharp Hatton at Hatton's prime weight. Hatton gets further advantages from being at 140 than 147lbs and the level of weight cutting then, adds to my argument not yours. Hatton was a bit of a big bully and should have especially finished the little nat, Manny Pacquiao.
     
  3. Dr Steelhammer.

    Dr Steelhammer. New Member Full Member

    89
    4
    Nov 27, 2015
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    Hatton never made any excuses about the weight so why should you? He said pbf wasn't big and that fighting him at 147 was better for him because he didn't have to cut as much weight for training as he did when fighting at 140. He also said he knew he was going to weigh more than pbf on fight night awayway.