Why do Many Rank Crawford>Loma P4P #1??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by POTUS, Apr 16, 2019.


Page 2 of 2
  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,241
    Oct 7, 2006
    Craving for my attention Lance? Hahah
     
    IsaL, Apr 16, 2019
    IsaL, Apr 16, 2019
    #16
  2. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Calling you a f*CKIN idiot...idiot....is not asking for your attention bitchboy...
     
    LANCE99, Apr 16, 2019
    LANCE99, Apr 16, 2019
    #17
  3. POTUS

    POTUS Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,887
    3,920
    Nov 26, 2016
    I have actually watched all of his except a few of his early fights.
    I always like their style. Postol didn't have the luxury of fighting "binmen".

    Postol just has better hooks & combos against better comp. Better speed & footwork too. Postol never got "exhausted" either, so maybe Postol is the better athlete. Wlad has the longer title reign I'm just saying Postol has been compared to a miniature Klitschko
     
    POTUS, Apr 16, 2019
    POTUS, Apr 16, 2019
    #18
    LANCE99 likes this.
  4. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    You need to understand the difference comparing a LW and a HW. The physiology of the two is just two great in difference. Apples and oranges you are trying to compare.
     
    LANCE99, Apr 16, 2019
    LANCE99, Apr 16, 2019
    #19
    POTUS likes this.
  5. zaper

    zaper New Member banned Full Member

    1
    1
    Mar 23, 2019
    Because he has yet to lose to an Uber driver.
     
    zaper, Apr 16, 2019
    zaper, Apr 16, 2019
    #20
    POTUS likes this.
  6. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,384
    Jan 6, 2007
    you could make a case for either on.

    Loma is a better boxer.

    Crawford has a slightly better resume.

    1-2 or 2-1, fine either way.
     
    cuchulain, Apr 16, 2019
    cuchulain, Apr 16, 2019
    #21
Page 2 of 2