Why Do Most Pac Fans Not Want Bradley II?

Because it was a boring, noncompetitive fight with NO DRAMA at all. Pac doesn't go in for the kill anymore, Bradley can't do **** offensively, terrible match up in which Bradley ONLY won round 10 clearly based on my scoring criteria (effective aggression and making opponent miss - he actually did damage in that round, in the rest Pac caught EVERY shot on his gloves and landed a few hard shots on Tim.)

Marquez Pac was a very competitive match up everytime, and it was not as boring. Manny won the first two clearly and surprisingly lost the third one clearly on my score cards, which do not favor counterpunchers who can't create opportunities when their opponents don't do anything (Pac lands one, misses two, gets hit twice, lands one - since Pac started it I give most exchanges to Pac in the first two fights since JMM rarely created his own openings and Pac took the risks and then landed an equal amount, except for the clear rounds for either fighter). Pac got no credit for his defense in those fights - JMM missed a TON in the first two but his combinations look nice so people score for him, while Pac's sloppy tripping obscures how cleanly he lands the shots on JMM.

Make the Floyd fight and retire, all these options suck.

 

so you're basically saying there is no possibility of Pac losing to Marquez

 

Well stated. Just looking at the other posts, in this thread, and others from wisejester, he DOES NOT get it. HE doesn't use any form of logic OR consistency. I applaud your efforts of tryting to explain something so simple, only to have him repeat his posts, but you're wasting time.

Well said though.