it was wlad who maked that fight. noway haye deserves 50/50! btw. its not standard K2 contract for voluntary defences, its a normal boxing contract for voluntary defences. the klits are not dump! haye wanted to fight wlad and than vitali, so he became those contract. :deal
atsch Erm, you don't tell someone they don't deserve 50% of their own Tv deal you murky brown fart water drinker. I don't know what you find confusing about that. Haye said Wlad can keep his own TV money and other income, and Haye will keep his. But Wlad said that the fight will not happen unless Haye shares 50% of his own Tv contract with him. And yes, a standard boxing contract says that if you beat me you have to fight my brother, and if you beat him you have to fight me again. Is that what you think all boxing contracts say?
without klitschko, never ever haye would became so popular. it was toevid who stalked klitschko and makes tshirts. are you kiddng me brittard? a standard boxing contract for voluntary defences says that you must give a rematch immediately. that why lewis sued rahman, when he was ktfo. so rahman had to fight lewis again.
:rofl Does a standard boxing contract say that you have to fight your opponents 's brother if you win, and then your opponent again if you beat his brother?
it was toevid who wanted to fight one klitschko , beat him and than to fight the other klitschko. again for you brittard. the champ dictates the terms by voluntary defences:deal
That's not the question, the question is: does a STANDARD boxing contract include stipulations that you must fight your opponent's brother if you win, and then rematch your opponent if you beat his brother? You already said it does, but I'm giving you the chance to restore some dignity and admit you were lying.
yes its a standart boxing contract by voluntary defences, that the champ dictates the terms. its normal. and haye singed this contract:deal so whats your problem?