Why do people accuse Haye of ducking?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vidic, Jul 26, 2012.


  1. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    :good
     
  2. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010

    it was wlad who maked that fight. noway haye deserves 50/50!

    btw.

    its not standard K2 contract for voluntary defences, its a normal boxing contract for voluntary defences. the klits are not dump! haye wanted to fight wlad and than vitali, so he became those contract. :deal
     
  3. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :patsch

    Erm, you don't tell someone they don't deserve 50% of their own Tv deal you murky brown fart water drinker. I don't know what you find confusing about that.

    Haye said Wlad can keep his own TV money and other income, and Haye will keep his. But Wlad said that the fight will not happen unless Haye shares 50% of his own Tv contract with him.

    And yes, a standard boxing contract says that if you beat me you have to fight my brother, and if you beat him you have to fight me again. Is that what you think all boxing contracts say?
     
  4. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010
    without klitschko, never ever haye would became so popular. it was toevid who stalked klitschko and makes tshirts.

    are you kiddng me brittard? a standard boxing contract for voluntary defences says that you must give a rematch immediately. that why lewis sued rahman, when he was ktfo. so rahman had to fight lewis again.
     
  5. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :rofl

    Does a standard boxing contract say that you have to fight your opponents
    's brother if you win, and then your opponent again if you beat his brother?
     
  6. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010

    it was toevid who wanted to fight one klitschko , beat him and than to fight the other klitschko.

    again for you brittard. the champ dictates the terms by voluntary defences:deal
     
  7. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    That's not the question, the question is: does a STANDARD boxing contract include stipulations that you must fight your opponent's brother if you win, and then rematch your opponent if you beat his brother?

    You already said it does, but I'm giving you the chance to restore some dignity and admit you were lying.
     
  8. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW1S4B2zlwk"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW1S4B2zlwk[/ame]
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
  10. BunnyGibbons

    BunnyGibbons Is Not About That Life Full Member

    6
    6
    Jun 9, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  11. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    He's clearly injured. Look at the agony in his face
     
  12. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Everyone without an agenda understands why Haye had to pull out the fight with Wlad in 2009
     
  13. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010

    yes its a standart boxing contract by voluntary defences, that the champ dictates the terms. its normal. and haye singed this contract:deal so whats your problem?
     
  14. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :patsch
     
  15. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    i am literally shedding tears of laughter