Why do people consider Wlad a better boxer than Vitali?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DanishFightfan, Jul 28, 2011.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006

    ...which parts?
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    the parts that acknowledge Vitali as the superior boxer.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    Then your seal of approval is of trifling value! :deal
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    The day you and I have the same point of view on something related to boxing I will have to seriously reconsider my grasp of the sport!

    :smoke
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    :yep Surely there has to be some overlap, somewhere - law of averages? :think
     
  6. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    and better footwork.better at cutting off the ring..overall speed..timing..im guessing u mean to say wlad is better at everything compared to vitali other than the fact vitali has an iron chin..
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    you'd think so, with nearly 100K posts combined... but no.
     
  8. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    :deal:deal:deal
     
  9. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    Man, you stole that from something I posted last month. :roll:
     
  10. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    The embarrassing loses don't count (that weren't against superior opposition)? Wlad lost rounds to Williamson. Vitali never would.