He is way to biased. He also talks about fighters personal lives way to much. He can't score fights at all. One top of that, he is fat. He just doesn't know boxing very well.
fat dan is biased criticises fighters for being fat bad scoring idiot in general thinks he knows more than he actually does horrible pun's mediocre writer his double chin rests on his lap when he sits down
he gets this weird attitude that you would find from a guy at a comic book shop. or an IT guy at work.weird superiority thing. His score cards and things like that are good but sometimes his opinion pieces smack of neckbeard smarminess.
He said he wished Shannon Briggs VS Vitali Klitschko went 15 rounds instead of 12 just because Briggs criticized his coverage of the fight. Have you seen that fight?
Used to not like the guy but he's one of few extremely active boxing pundits and he makes himself more accessible than any other. He also contributes more than any other boxing scriibe in the way of updates and news from around the boxing world so I appreciate him. I give fat dan his props now, he's on the ball even if his knowledge of the technical aspect of fighting and his knowledge of strategy is almost non existent he gives us fans more than anyone else.
I just don't care for the guy. he's a pig ****** that cant do a sit up but know everything about boxing? he says ridiculous **** and his score cards are disgraceful.
Using Dwyer's style, he's a fanboy masquerading as a writer. Not a fan of Cloud so the robbery was a robbery, big fan of Alexander, so had Devon beating Kotelnik 8 to 4, pretty much exposing him incapable for the job.