Why do people judge the old time fighters so harshly?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Reason123, Sep 20, 2015.

  1. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,077
    Likes Received:
    16,731
    you are the guy with the opinions on how a guy is affected by drugs and mental health problems foxy. Nice try flipping that bias onto me :p

    I only said that you cant discount guys like Tucker or Berbick as grade A wins just because they had drug/booze/mental health issues.

    You discount them totally even though they were solid wins for Tyson. Thus you are biased towards Tyson, Foxy. Therefore you under rate him.

    We are all biased by degree obviously Foxy. You just take it to a extreme degree with blind hatred. That's cool, its just who you are dude :deal

    So you rate Ali , then Lewis, then Louis as your top 3 heavyweights. Don't try to get out of it ever again Foxy. Those are your top 3 heavyweights as stated by you :deal

    Now I ask you, what HEAVYWEIGHT would you rank in the number 4 and 5 slot?

    Can you do that without adding in lighter weighted fighters or will your brain refuse to let that happen so as you can keep concealing your opinions on what heavyweights you feel were the best of all time?

    By the way Foxy,, I rate Lewis and Ali as my top two heavy weights as well so looks like we see eye to eye on some issues :rasta