Why do people not acknowledge that Hopkins/Pascal 2 was a close fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Aug 11, 2011.


  1. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    good review of the fight
     
  2. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    because youre gay?
     
  4. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    People really wanted Hopkins to win so they could witness history.

    I thought both fights were close and could have gone either way.

    Some people wanted Hopkins to win so badly that they ended up giving Hopkins 9 or 10 rounds in each fight.
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,374
    3,469
    Dec 11, 2009
    STFU *** :|
     
  6. beefman180

    beefman180 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    2
    May 16, 2011
    116-112 Hopkins

    Pascal took too many rounds off.
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,374
    3,469
    Dec 11, 2009
    :huh. Go into the lounge *****. You obviously arent here to comment on boxing
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,374
    3,469
    Dec 11, 2009
    That is a very good point. People wanted to see history made
     
  9. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,558
    7
    Aug 8, 2007
    In Chad's personal view, the first fight was won by Bernard and in the second fight he dominated, so... I know Chad is no Max or Larry or Teddy but he's just the next guy on the line.
     
  10. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Hopkins won pretty wide on my scorecard if I remember right. Pascal only had a few good rounds.
     
  11. blacktopbully

    blacktopbully Boxing Addict banned

    4,703
    1
    May 2, 2011
    ohhh big time come back

    shut the **** up faaaag that works well cause you know nobody has ever called anybody a *** around these parts

    what's next you gonna ask him for his address?
     
  12. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    6
    Jan 13, 2008
    ahh Failey trying to discredit B-Hop. lol it was a good fight. Hopkins won clearly though even after being robbed of two knockdowns.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    hopkins clearly beat pascal in both fights, just as he clearly beat mercado in the first and taylor in the first.

    i think he beat calzaghe but can understand the counter argument.

    anyways to address the thread question, it wasn't close. hopkins again took him to school quite clearly.
     
  14. Hamilton

    Hamilton Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Nov 26, 2010
    Hopkins won the fight. I had it 116-112. It should have been at least a point more, as that first KD sure looked legitimate to me. Also, the first fight was a lot closer due to the 2 KD's, one of which was questionable. After about the fourth round, Hopkins just took over in both fights. I don't think the history angle played a role in the scoring of the second fight as much as the scoring for the first fight did. There was a bit of an outcry about the officiating, whether warranted or not, for the first fight, and I feel this was constantly under consideration in Canada. Just my opinion.
     
  15. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    I think the word you're looking for is competitive. Winning the early rounds and putting forth some good effort in a few of the later rounds makes the fight competitive, but Hopkins dominated in the rounds he won.