Why do people say Froch was outclassed against Taylor when he wasn't!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by hammers571, Feb 28, 2012.


  1. hammers571

    hammers571 Guest

    He was hardly outclassed he was 106 - 102 down twice and 106 - 102 up on the other scorecard. If Taylor has lasted the 14 seconds and the last round had been 10-8 Taylor would have won by split decision with scores of 114 - 112 twice for Taylor and 116 - 110 for Froch. Those scores hardly show that Froch was outclassed as people make out he was!
     
  2. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Only people who have not seen the fight would say Taylor was outclassed.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    The scores mean little but as per the flow Frochy clearly got into the fight in the 2nd half of the fight. Regardless, Taylor was landing the flashier and sharper work throughout, luckily for Froch it was his stamina, will and pressure that brought about the win. One of his best performances IMO.
     
  4. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    :lol::lol:

    Must really grind his gears
     
  5. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Where are all these weird posters sprouting out from?

    No **** better say, 'ask yourself'. :lol:
     
  6. HeavyT

    HeavyT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,709
    19
    Feb 9, 2009
    He wasn't outclassed, but it was his biggest test (yes, even moreso than Pascal) and it showed.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    I completely mis read this thread... :patsch
     
  8. 1stcontact

    1stcontact Like Mo, But Better Full Member

    1,797
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    I dont know you're the expert :smoke