Why do people say "Lineal" when they mean "Ring"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andrewa1, Apr 25, 2017.

  1. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,071
    Wlad was never truly a "Lineal" champ, he was a Ring champ. Ring has done a good job of marketing their title as lineal, but it's not. True lineal can only happen if A. There is an unbroken string of undisputed champs to time immemorial or B All belts are united, thus creating an undisputed champ from which a lineal champ can flow.

    To be clear, I'm not discrediting Wlad, it's next to impossible to become lineal in this era. The point is people should stop overfocusing on whether someone is "lineal" or not and just look at credibility of belt, resume, etc.
     
    BCS8, like a boss, bailey and 2 others like this.
  2. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    664
    I believe Wlad was lineal.
    There's no hard and fast rule about how a new "line" starts. It doesn't have to be unifying all the belts. Wlad was proven to be the outstanding fighter in the world, and that can be argued at various points over the years based on his wins, and was especially clear when Vitali retired - there was no reason to dispute it.
    The WBC calling Bermane Stiverne champion just made their belt look silly, it hardly invalidated the claim that championship lineage belonged to Wlad at that point, if not years earlier.
     
    Ph33rknot likes this.
  3. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,071
    I don't have a problem with your way of looking at it. Although, imo Vitali was the best hw while they were both active, once he retired, Wlad was clearly the best.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,234
    I go with TBRB because i no longer care enough to give my own time to it.
     
  5. boxingscience

    boxingscience Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,879
    Likes Received:
    312
    I saw Wladimir as the lineal champion, the number one. Who cares about all the belts, it was obvious that Wladimir was the true champion, and now the true champion is Tyson Fury. Tyson win was the best thing to happen to heavyweight boxing because it opened up the whole division from wladimir's dominance, but then he messed it all up by going AWOL.
     
  6. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    38,553
    Likes Received:
    8,119
    Wlad was undisputably the man of the division for years, that makes him a lineal champion in my eyes. You're right, I agree with you on this, people here focus on technicalities.

    I'm not really a fan of the whole concept either. For me a unified or undisputed champion means more.
     
    Ph33rknot likes this.
  7. GolovKing

    GolovKing ESB Since 2006 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,235
    Likes Received:
    440
    Wlad was lineal champ. Linear champs can be crowned after the line is broken.
     
  8. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,071
    How is he lineal, then?

    If you mean he was the best champ after his bro retired, then I agree with you(although that's not really lineal).

    But otherwise, you are probably going off of Rings criteria of making a champ when their top two fighters face each other. That's Rings standard, not an actual new lineal line. That can only be created by undisputed champs.
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    40,336
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    Too many on here take a magazines opinions as literal
     
    radupidu and andrewa1 like this.
  10. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    10,075
    Lennox Lewis was Lineal Champion until he retired in 2004. The Lineal Title stayed vacant for 5 years until Wladimir fought Chagaev. Wladimir won and became Lineal (and Ring) Champion. Wladimir remained Lineal Champ until the Tyson Fury bout.
     
  11. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Messages:
    14,454
    Likes Received:
    11,247
    Crowned by RING.

    That's why it is now RING title, not lineal.
     
  12. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Messages:
    14,454
    Likes Received:
    11,247
    Once a lineal title ceases to be the-man-who-beat-the-man-who-beat-the-man it is no longer truly lineal.

    Take the middleweight lineal title for example. It has about 8 broken links in it since its inception and between 1993 and 2001 there wasn't even a recognized lineal champion.
     
  13. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,071
    Fixed it for you. Ring does not bestow lineal status.
     
  14. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Messages:
    14,454
    Likes Received:
    11,247
    The-man-who-beat-the-man-who-beat-the-man ceased to bestow most lineal titles decades ago.

    There are about 8 broken links in the middleweight chain just for starters.
     
  15. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    10,075
    Wrong. Wladimir won the vacant Ring Title and the vacant Lineal Title vs Chagaev. The Ring Title doesn't always follow the Lineal Champ, but in this case it did.
     
    Todd498 likes this.