Why do people seem to hold the Cockell fight against Marciano?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dempsey1238, Mar 22, 2012.


  1. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    I been wondering that after viewing a few post.

    Every champion has a easy defense here or there. Louis had his Paychecks, Ali had his Wepners and Williams, (Super shot) Tyson had his Marvin Frazier, and Holmes had his list of lesser contenders.

    It was not like Rocky was not faceing the best out there, He did have 2 back to back fights with Walcott, a win over Roland, back to back wars vs Charles, and one would think after 5 fights against number 1 contenders, Rocky Marciano earn a give me title defense?

    No one brings this up in regards to Dempsey, Ali or Louis or even Lewis.

    But in regards to Marciano? You never hear the end to it.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,808
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think you're way off the mark here.

    The one saving grace of rocky's career is his outstanding championship run with respect to his era. Valdes aside he beat every number 1 contender of his reign.

    The issue with don is that he's the one opponent who wasn't ranked above nino.

    Rocky is well regarded as one of the more comprehensive champions in history.

    The thing most people hold against him is his mythical h2h weaknesses and his lack of victories against guys who would be today called heavyweights.
     
  3. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    Maybe, but the Cockell fight vs Valdes is the main reason for gripe over Marciano's rein. Yes Valdes did earn the shot over Cockell, but I think Marciano should have gotting a easy one after that run to the title, than the run going into the Cockell fight.

    Valdes would have gotting his shot perhaps had he waited instand of rushing into the Moore fight. But people bring this one up compare to Valdes not getting his title shot(Or the Ezzard Charles debate if he was the "True" number 1 contender.)
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,808
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ofcourse it's the main reason; had he fought nino instead, he'd have beaten every number 1 contender and that would have significantly improved his standing.

    It's not so much anger as angst.

    Another shame for his career is that floyd beat moore. Had archie beat patterson rocky's standing would improve moreso.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think the Cockell defence was a try out for Rocky's nose ,injured against Charles in their second fight.
    Rocky got a bit of stick for letting Cockell stay around as long as he did , but as he had fought top challengers, I don't think it was anything too heavy.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,566
    46,167
    Feb 11, 2005
    1) Don Cockell looked like this:
    This content is protected


    2) Before finally stopping Cockell, Rocky threw every meaningful legal punch, even more illegal punches and even this:
    This content is protected
     
  7. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    It was a fair fight, the English dont know American fighting. ( Why we are 2-0 against them in wars)

    Sure there may have been a punch that weave here or there, but over all Marciano beat him fair. The rabbit punch before the knockdown Cockell turn into that.

    As for being hit down, the punch was all ready on its way and Marciano could not stop it.(His own words on the down punch.)
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    WE get in wars at the start, not halfway through.:lol:
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Seamus, are you ****ing high?




    Rocky doesn't have a loss. Cockell is by far his worst filmed performance. So it takes on a meaning in people's minds that maybe it shouldn't.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,566
    46,167
    Feb 11, 2005
    No, do you have any?


    Are you sure he doesn't have a loss, because I have never heard such a thing. Are you trying to tell me he went 49-0? Really? Wow. You learn something new everyday.
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    Because it is an easy target to use to put Rocky into perspective ... the only man under thirty and over 200 pounds that he fought for his title ... the fact that the hopelessly outclassed Cockell took dozens of Rocky's best shots and took them well before crumbling builds the case against Rocky being able to dominate young, strong bigger men .. Cockell was not one but he was not 37, 39 or a tiny guy like LaStarza ..
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    cockell was better than he looked. He beat lastarza and mathews and was unbeaten as a heavyweight. The marciano fight finished him, don never won another fight so any kudos valdes gets for beating cockell is wiped out in my view. Valdes, aside from being big is SO over rated. He lost to 175 pounders satterfeild, moore, johnson the only name fighter nino actualy beat during marciano's championship was jackson. Remember charles was bear hugged to death and never given a rematch because ezzard still was beating all the guys who beat nino.
     
  13. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    though Cockell was in with certain defeat, he wasn't a proper HW, but rather a sick man, I always feel that fighters be ranked and rated at their true weight and anything above only enhances their resume.

    Don Cockell was a Very Good, lesser great L-HW who showed his worth in some respectful HW outings, and that hows this fight should be seen... because his Pilsbury Dough Boy metabolism is the same thing that killed him relatively young, 54.

    Marciano doesn't get anymore kudos here, nor should Cockell lose any!
     
  14. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    It is 1:1 as far as i know : [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812[/ame]
    And if u wonder who won ask yourself y is Canada a part of d commonwealth (or was such until some point ind 20th century) and not part of d U.S :deal
     
  15. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    keep keeping it real , Rocco's foul play doesn't deserve any credit either .