Why do people think fury beats a prime Wlad?

Good points.

:good

 

meaning, u opened ur eyes 4 eventuallyafter 2 pages of denial.

u ought not to hate someone who disagrees with you on a single point about your idol, it makes u blind to when they agree with you, your mistake.

 

well they are both idiots so don't feel too badly about it :deal :hat

Dino has more hatred towards the Klits than Herol, but Herol is far more of a weasel about it whereas Dino is more straightforwards in his hating of them. Herol tries hard to conceal his.

Recently Herol has been lightening up on the Klits after years of getting called out on it :good

Still he has relapses often

 

It's subjective isn't it.

The cuts were awful, they were from punches and not from a clash of heads, and it was a fair stoppage. But I could never say that Lennox destroyed him. That's not my definition of being destroyed.

Look at Roy's cut against Joe. That was really bad and I can't understand why that wasn't stopped. I've seen cuts nowhere near as bad that resulted in stoppages. But I could never say that Joe destroyed Roy.

Lennox won fair and square, but I think he was fortunate and he wanted nothing to do with a rematch.

 

thanks for the info. i knew he was a turd

 

Funny how the division got good when wlad turned 40 😁. Wlad was still sharp at 37 the age Lewis was when he was thoroughly outboxed by vitaly. He has been slipping in the last couple of years and will struggle with every top guy now. He would probably get beaten by David haye at this point in time and I don't like haye but he is better than fury

 

Wlad was 38 when he destroyed the No#1 HW contender. And was 39 when he got beaten by Fury. There was no deference between the two Wlads.

The division was at its all time worst and Wlad was still flopping around on the canvas in his prime.
The division is currently the best its been since the 90's. Everybody knows that.
It was the worst era known to man while Wlad reigned over it. And he still went life and death with the worst it had to offer.

Haye the total fraud of a boxer ran in fear from Fury twice. Fury is stylistically all wrong for Haye in every way shape and form.
Your boxing knowledge rates a Zero out of Ten.

 

whislt true, the fact is that pulev was a pile of shyt. he struggled to get past a 40something, only able to beat him when he gassed out. Pulev is mediocre, he'd get stopped by any hw titlist in history.

 

:good

Many of them were in complete denial that Wlad was anywhere past his prime BEFORE he lost to Fury.
Now they call people "crazy" for saying prime Wlad could lose to Fury.

They hate the fact that Wlad lost.
They HOPE desperately that he'll win the rematch so they can dismiss the first fight as a "fluke".

Not sure why they can't just give the winner credit. Whoever that may be.
May the best man win.

 

In boxing, I wouldn't factor in age in the equation when boxers squaring it in the ring are either above 20 and below 40. All extremes have pros and cons. the older one gets, the better regarding experience and stamina. The younger you are, probably you would be faster, but you may be inadequate in things I have said above. So lets not use age here, Wladimir just fought a good boxer and that shocked his system (the mind and soul) and adjusting was a problem. I suspect he will try and do something different while Peter Fury is not just sitting down but informing Tyson to be on the lookout. I predict Tyson Fury will go for an early KO. Get it from me.

 

lets not use age? yet every heavyweight champion in history has retired from defending before 40, with 2 exceptions.

yeh u can not use age, but everyone else including all hws in history, THEY WILL USE AGE, don't tell them what to do.