A moron calling his superior a moron? How many more punches did Tyson Fury have over Wlad each round?
Yet his injury riddled brother was tooling everybody up untill 41 years of age. Look what he did to Briggs at 39. Its all about the opponent. If Prime Wlad couldn't beat Sander , he wouldn't beat Fury.
What makes you think Sanders beats Wlad 10 out of 10 times they fight? What makes you think Sanders wont shatter Furies jaw as well?
Your insight is moot. You picked against Wlad until finally getting it right. The vast majority of the forum(even non-Klitschko fans) think you're a moron who DKSAB.
Not Even the people on this forum who feel antipathy towards my posts, and assiduously attempt at repudiating them, think I am a moron. You on the other hand, hold a reputation that is vile, nobody likes your sorry AZZ :rofl
Molasses like pillow puff punching Thompson busted up Wlad with left hand lead counters. Put Sanders in there and its the first result all over again. This is the logical conclusion and cannot be denied.
let me translate 4 u. tko = stopped 6 = less than half the rounds needed destroyed = take a look at vits destroyed face. yeah lewis wrecked him up with more than 6 rounds to spare, he'd have taken both K bros out in single round figures if he'd been given the chance, since wlad goes out in seconds to hard hitters. worst ever lewis that is, vs prime Ks.
It is quite possible that Fury can go on a long winning streak and prove that he was always Wlad's superior :think
Link to the posts where i predicted Wlad to beat Mormek ,Pianeta , Thompson , Wach , Leapai , Jennings. Do it now or stfu and never mention it again.
Wlad had height, reach and weight advantages over a fair few of his opponents. When he fought Tyson, he fought someone bigger, younger and who had supreme confidence. For a long time, Wlad had gotten away with leaning and holding on smaller guys. Fighting Fury presented him with a big challenge that he hadn't had in a long time.