Why do people think fury beats a prime Wlad?

so...the randomness only occurs for that one fight against an elite. but never ever again for bumclub

yup. do the math.

 

I asume from that, u've STILL not realised u fcuked up yet?


go back and read n bleed.

 

Nope, it is an act of randomness, considering Lennox fails to cut up and force a doctors stoppage on 95 percent of his opponents :deal

Deal with the facts.

 

As in, if lewis hadn't punched vitali, then the cut wuld have STILL opened anyway by RANDOM.

HAHA u r funny if u think that.

 

atsch The problem here, is that you have stumbled on a logical road block, nothing you are saying is logically sound, nothing. But you have a reputation of being this way, so not surprising.

 

that's an interesting new take on your error - explain the road block to me please.

but be warned u wont like what u discover about your mistake when it dawns on u.

 

You really are hilarious :yep

 

u laugh at your own mistkes that's good thanks 4 joining in.

explain that road block, that's going to be the best bit.

 

atsch

:rofl Whatever....keep on being irrational. This thread is dead.

 

no explain your road block.i cant wait for the penny to drop and u realise ur fcukup. I'll quit after that.

or r u running away becos you've noticed your mistake already?

 

The majority of small fighters Wlad faced were the modern day small HW's who are generally fat, flat footed and slow. The only person I can think of off the top of my head who was smaller than Wlad and wasn't slow and/or flat footed was Haye. However, Haye didn't have the style I described to potentially beat Wlad. Haye relied upon slipping the jab and then leaping in, instead of using quick footwork to get in close. Leaping in against a man who is bigger, has a longer reach and moves backwards at the first sign of aggression from his opponent was never going to work against Wlad.

Obviously, this is hypothetical, but to claim that Wlad is impenetrable against smaller fighters without taking into account the talent of these fighters would be akin to saying that pre-Fury, size isn't a problem for Wlad because he beat Wach and Thompson.

 

1) A cut, and a forced doctor stoppage is an act of randomness that nobody has any control over.

2) A cut and a forced doctors stoppage victory is an act of randomness that nobody has any control over, especially if the victor was also being outboxed and made to look silly.

3) You claimed Wlad lost because he is inferior to Fury, not because he is old, despite the fact that you belittle Fury's victory over Wlad because he was old :nut

 

just quit now Herol

 

- here we are, the fun bit that's relevant.

can u substantiate what you just wrote? Because I recall writing that prime waldo deals with fury.

will you now realise u confused my posts with someone elses?
more to the point WILL U ADMIT IT?

 

Of course, but Wlad couldn't let his hands go or change tactics. That wasn't solely down to his age, it was psychological. A mental block.

If Wlad wants to knock out Tyson, he'll obviously have to come out much more aggressive.

It's really intriguing.

I can't wait.