Why do people think Jack Dempsey is so good? He isn't

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by I Know Everythi, Feb 14, 2014.


  1. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,440
    Feb 10, 2013
    Normally this argument might hold weight but Dempsey's bread and butter was winning fights early. If ever a guy was designed for a four rounder it was Dempsey. A guy cant have it both ways. He cant be considered one of the greatest short distance fighters in history and then use the excuse that he ran out of time against a fat guy who turned pro at 98 pounds at the end of four rounds.
     
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Well that's better. Still Marciano and Fitz and Sullivan and Langford and Herb.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,673
    27,387
    Feb 15, 2006
    A rather valid point!

    It has to be thought that the 4 round bouts might have held less weight politicaly.

    Nobody was arguing for Meehan to face Fred Fulton, instead of Dempsey.

    Either way, how could you not admire Meehan?
     
  4. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    And dont forget Elroy would have most definitely thrown Wlad in our faces...
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,440
    Feb 10, 2013
    herb!!!
     
  6. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    A human typhoon he was.:D
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,514
    47,697
    Feb 11, 2005