JMM should be 3 . JOE has kessler and hopkins as leverage what does JMM have ? A loss to Manny and a win over Casamayor ? Thats not enough for a # 2 spot imo .
The reason - 'Cos he's not American & the editors are still sore at him beating two American legends last two times out. They were annoyed at having to rewrite their articles last minute making up excuses for why Calzaghe isn't a legend. :twisted: Pathetic. atsch
atsch A word of advice....... Think before you speak. It is better to stay quiet and have people think you are stupid, rather than posting and proving it :deal :hi:
Your opinion is wrong. Here are the correct scores, if you're interested in learning something. JMM 114-111 (first) Pac 114-113 (second) You're welcome.
This is the correct answer, except the "when" part of Pac losing to DLH. Pac MIGHT lose to DLH but I dont think he does. Good sh!t overall Beeston.
The second fight was much closer than the first, which in truth wasn't close at all. I don't really argue with you saying that Pac won, I went for JMM because he dictated most of the action.
I have Marquez at 2 behind Pac. I can't put him above Pac even though I thought he won because I always go by the official result. Calzaghe is 3/4 with Hopkins.
calzaghe is undefeated,jmm isnt,calzaghe is a better fighter than jmm, so who gives a **** about jmm beating casamayor and calzaghe only beating rjj. calzaghe is better and deserves to be no2.end of.