Why do so many people on ESB think Calzaghe is P4P #1 or #2?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sambob, Dec 28, 2007.


  1. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    I'm not trying to start an argument, talk about Floyd, offend Calzaghe fans or anything, but I'm genuinely interested. :thumbsup

    I've only seen his fights with Kessler, Bika, Manfredo, and Lacy, so this is why I'm asking.

    What Joe does well I think is very impressive. He's obviously one of those tremendously talented natural athletes we see sometimes in boxing like a Floyd Mayweather, a Roy Jones, a Pernel Whitaker, etc etc..

    But even though it hasn't made him lose yet, it seems to me there are so many things he does BADLY that I just don't see how he is perceived as being that good. Its obvious he hasn't been in with all that much real big opposition. Mikkel Kessler is very solid, but I really can only base this on watching him fight Calzaghe, as the Andrade fight isn't mmuch to go by. Kessler looked impressive in his fight with Calzaghe, though of course he clearly lost (I think he is amazing at making room for his punches).

    Anyway it just frustrates me to no end to see Calzaghe (while fighting Kessler, as I just watched it twice on HBO) lunging in with his head out and getting caught by uppercuts and 1-2s, throwing wide punches that couldn't possibly land, and in his fight with Lacy and Manfredo I noticed that he had a tendency to SLAP instead of punching when he's trying to flurry against fighters on the ropes a la Sugar Ray Leonard (but of course he's slapping not punching so its not the same thing). Also in the Kessler fight I notice him throwing some VERY wild body punches that leave him open, kind of like punches you see thrown in the amateurs against opponents that don't know how to take advantage of it. Also he seems to let himself get out of position at times for no reason at all.

    Anyway I really like watching the guy and after watching the Kessler fight am definitely a fan of his, and can't wait until his next fight. :good

    But that being said... how is he P4P #2 when he hasn't fought any other real champions or strong contenders, and he makes a lot of mistakes?

    And secondly, could maybe some fans from Wales and the rest of the UK recommend some other of his fights to try to dig up? I'd like to see him at his best because even if he has just been fighting WBO mandatories for years, I can't imagine that all of those European fighters whose names I don't recognize are crap.

    Sorry for being so long winded but thanks for anyone that actually reads my entire post (at least I use paragraphs!). :hi:

    :bbb
     
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,473
    15,804
    Jul 19, 2004
    Calzaghe is GROSSLY overrated on this site. It all started with the Lacy victory.

    The group delusion is inexplicable.

    :smoke
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,473
    15,804
    Jul 19, 2004
    He said #1 or #2, though, and although it may seem I'm nitpicking, there is a considerable difference.

    Incidentally, I have him at #4 based on longevity and defenses, but he's grossly lacking in terms of quality competition.
     
  4. C HOP

    C HOP The World Awaits Full Member

    4,158
    61
    Nov 30, 2007
    Cos he has went 44 fights unbeaten

    held the belt for 10 years

    fought tremendously great against lacy which proved how a boxer can fight a perfect fight

    calzaghe has proven to us brits he can take a punch and box like one of the best

    he is a great fighter

    Americans have only seen calzaghe over a few number of fights
     
  5. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  6. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    The Ring has him at #5 I believe.

    And I don't think longevity should really have any effect on it if it hasn't been at a very high level of competition.

    And as far as accomplishments, he won the title from Eubank (right?), which is pretty good I guess, and he unified it with Kessler. What else?
     
  7. Words

    Words Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    6
    Apr 21, 2007
    This is true. He's overrated because he's got an undefeated record and coz he's recently stepped up and cleaned out the division.

    However, if he'd have done that 5 or 6 years ago, and if he'd been fighter the top contenders back then instead of waiting for them all to retire, I very much doubt he'd be unbeaten today. Against Roy Jones and James Toney he would've had awful trouble, and even guys like Antwun Echols, Sven Ottke and Glen Johnson would've been able to give him a real hard time. If you stretch that to include Hopkins, Michelcheski, Taylor and Tarver then he might've had a few losses on his resume.

    he's a good fighter, but he has flaws. He got caught easily by Kessler, when he tries to overwhelm people with punch volume sometimes he gets careless, and a skilled counterpuncher would take advantage of it. Kessler is not a counter-puncher, he just kept his nerve when Joe was flurrying and hit with the right hand, which really ****ed up Joe's gameplan.

    However joe is a versatile and experienced champion, so he adapted and won the fight. No doubt he is a great fighter, but he's nothing like as good some people think. he's P4P top 5, behind Mayweather, Pacquaoi, Cotto and Hopkins. Infact I'd possibly rank Hatton above him too, Ricky has better wins and a much higher standard of competition than Calzaghe.

    I also reckon that Herol Graham was a more skilled fighters, and Nigel Benn would've really given him hell in his prime. Eubank in his prime possibly the same.
     
  8. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    I'll tell you one thing. By the time Bernard Hopkins had accomplished the same things as Calzage he was number on on the ring rankings. Calzages opponents in defending his WBO title 21 times are not worse than Hopkins all so great 20 defenses of his middlewight title. He consistently beat top guys in his weight class (though it was a weak weight class). And as of recently hsa beaten the 2 hottest guys in his division one whom everyone was picking to beat him at 3/1 odds.

    Counting professional and amatuer fights Joe has only lost once in the past 20 years. He has hand speed to rival anyone else in boxing. When he gets hit he fights back twice as hard, he has cleaned out his division and then some and I really wouldn't ppick anyone 175 or lower to beat him right now. I got no problem with people having floyd at number 1 but if someone has Joe at number 1 or 2, I have no problem with that either. As an american I am willing to admit that if he was american he would be getting so much more credit than he does right now.
     
  9. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    1. Who would you rate above him? Pacman (1dimensional, outboxable), BHOPS (ancient and fighting on the seniors circuit and ducking Calazage), Dawson (excellent but a bit unproven at the elite), Cotto (very good but never fought the no1 Mayweather - turned down Mayweather and the best fighters at 140 and only 2 top 1s at 147), Marquez (very good but getting old), Juan Diaz (never fought the elite)

    2. Hes the only fighter in the sport to clean out his division in the last few years.

    3. Beating the other top 2 fighters at your weight is rarely achieved, especially while staying unbeaten

    4. Unbeaten 10year Champ

    5. Hes very complete with few weaknesses and is hard to beat
     
  11. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  12. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    Well thats nice that you think that, however, I just posted EXACTLY why I am questioning (or asking about rather) his P4P status, and it included NONE of those things.. So why don't you try again?

    But Lacy isn't that good.. don't you feel that to be at the TOP he needs to dominate some serious competition as well, like Floyd has done??

    Oh and also one last thing, I thought P4P was called P4P because it ranks skill regardless of weight! Well Calzaghe has only fought at super middleweight. Guys like Floyd, Pacquiao, Winky, Juan Marquez, Hopkins, and even to a lesser degree even Hatton have fought in multiple weight classes, against multiple champions.

    Calzaghe has only fought two champions/title holders.
     
  13. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  14. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    I don't think Hopkins should have been P4P that high either. don't assume so just because I am American too. I never said anything about Hopkins, I am talking about Calzaghe. I don't think Hopkins should have gotten credit just for TITLE DEFENSES. But for the record, he didn't just get credit for title DEFENSES, keep in mind he unified the titles too, and his last defenses were for the UNDISPUTED middleweight championship.

    I think Hopkins deserves it NOW for fighting well past the mid 30s (thats where Joe is now, so I'm still waiting on that one for him), and moving up to Light Heavyweight to fight and beat impressively the champ there..

    I'm still waiting for recommendations on Calzaghe fights to watch against good opposition. I'd really like to see these.
     
  15. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007