Why Do Some Of You People Support Margarito?

Nah you are evading my question . . . if that was "very conclusive" . . . a violation that could result to the death of other fighters . . . why didn't he get a lifetime ban?

You can't get away with this until you answer it. This question will be slapped back into your face repeatedly. :deal

 

I think he meant potentially, depending on what they discover.

 

I know, I should stop helping

 

Yeah . . . and you call that conclusive at this point?

I'm just asking him to explain the craps that comes out of his mouth. It was him who posted . . . it could result in the death of other fighters . . . so how serious was that? If that was conclusively proven Margarito could be facing criminal chages . . . that's my point . . . that's my arguement.

 

:sad2

 

So if I say someone defitnely committed a murder it is the same as some one attempted murder?

And besides there is still no proof for either! A conviction is supposed to result from evidence, not used as evidence like the thread starter is claiming

 

Nah nah nah you are desperate and you are being OWNED brother. :yep

You said it could result into the death of other fighters. You said that was conclusive.

Well how come a violation that could result into the death of other fighters will only get 1 year ban? Putting in danger the lives of other fighters should be the graviest infraction of the rules . . . and it should get a lifetime ban not one year plus a possible criminal charges.

Now justify your craps. :hi:

 

it's bad enough, like if i attempted to murder your mother. whether i succeed or not, it's bad news homey.
i'm done with the thread starter, he's lost it by now. :bart

 

That's right . . . your word is not the law . . . remember you said that . . . not me.

OWNED!

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

. . . and what you are posting is just

This content is protected

It was you who said it's conclusive . . . how come only one year ban . . . when other fighters lives were at stake?


You keep . . . repeating it's a fact . . . now answer my question because it will comeback to your face until you stop trolling with your hate posts.

Now who's dumb ???

:hi:

 

Here's another one buddy . . . in your effort to pull down the guy . . . you keep sinking in your own ****.

Was it Margarito who was caught trying to illegally place something in his wraps? . . . or it is his trainer?

Your

This content is protected

clearly says Margarito . . . as highlighted. :deal

Owned again.

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

In my opinion, Margo is suspended for "attempted" cheating as opposed to cheating. SO while I can conclude that he has been doing this for years, we can all agree that his corner tried to do something illegal...

 

Okay but is it a "FACT" that Margarito cheated?

That is what the thread starter (who abandoned the thread to make another) claims.

 

Because it's hard for the nutthuggers to let go...it's hard to believe that the man that they thought was a beast...was really a *****:deal