Why do some people think Canelo was not on the juice for the first GGG fight?

Nope. LOL.

People will literally believe what they want to believe, aka denial. It is truly shocking.

 

Innocent until proven guilty is the luxury of those who have not failed two tests and been suspended for DOPING VIOLATIONS.

 

Paulie M insists that hopping divisions and cutting shed loads of weight is only possible because of PEDs and I can well believe that as boxing is a game of pounds and inches afterall.

 

That’s pretty dumb logic, to be honest.

Just because his stamina and endurance weren’t good, doesn’t mean they weren’t artificially enhanced. He could have been that much worse had he been clean.

That’s like saying a guy with 9 HR in baseball can’t be on steroids, all of them have to hit 30+. A lot of pitchers get caught and they aren’t throwing 115 MPH.

There are many reasons to take PED’s. Clenbuterol inproves stamina and endurance and I’m sure makes it easier for him to preserve muscle while making weight. Is that what he was on the first fight? Maybe more? Who knows, but it’s naive to say a guy who just popped couldn’t possibly have been using the fight right before.

 

There's literally no evidence to suggest Povetkin was really on the roids, but we all know Canelo was on the juice - some ungodly anabolic steroids!

 

This is garbage, par for the course for you though.

- He beat Bradley convincingly 3 times.
- JMM is a hall of famer. Not sure why this is evidence as steroids against Manny?
- Morales beat Pacquiao.....also a Hof'er. Also got murked twice after.

Your evidence is basically "he was so good, he had to be on something". That's pretty crappy evidence. In terms of his body, do you apply the same logic to Floyd? Bradley? Marquez?

 

No it’s not. Beating a drained Morales after an L is not conquering a prime fighter. A more fresh version who already been in wars beat you. He didn’t beat Bradley convincingly the first fight. The fact that they fought 3 times nullified your fanboy argument. The rest of my post you didn’t even address. Move on.

 

hes suspect for life.

 

Winky Wright fought Bronco McKart 3 times, won clearly 3 times. There is a reason people consider Pac-Bradley I to be one of the biggest robberies in history. 125 media members scored it, 121 scored it for Pacquiao, 3 for Bradley, 1 a Draw. There is no logical argument for Bradley winning that fight.

Your arguments make no sense. You just implied he used roids because he lost to Morales, then beat him? But then proceed to say Morales was shop worn? Pick a side.

You are a troll and not a very good one.

 

I’ll raise you - why do some people think he won’t be for the second fight?

 

Now you’re playing dumb but it’s okay. The Bradley fights were close because he wasn’t on roids anymore. You don’t fight a man 3 times you convincingly beat lmao

Morales lost to Raheem and killed himself making weight then Manny could beat him finally. And yes, the version that did beat Pac was shop worn. Keep trying. Reality can suck for fanboys like you. He was a doper once Ariza entered the scene.

 

i dont know if people realize how unprecedented this type of behaviour has become at this scale. sure, there have always been some nuts running around creating their own reality, but the sheer number of these today is completely abnormal and im struggling to understand what could have caused it. i dont know if my generation just screwed up child rearing, or our life instructors just taught the wrong things, or all the genetically enhanced food we eat is starting to echo, or a combination of a million things. its biblical.

 

i like your posts because i often dont know when youre serious or making a joke for youre own entertainment, the way i often do. but you do provide a lot of pertinent information when making a point.