My response would be 1. How long was it between Maidana-Ortiz/May-Ortiz 3 or so years. 2. When Mayweather signed to fight Guerrero/Ortiz Bradley hadn't even fought at WW yet so after Pac/May who was the next highest rated WW. 3.How did Guerrero/Bradley/Ortiz earn there shot in order. Beat the #1/2 rated contenders for the title, fought a shot past prime LW, moved up and beat though a hypejob the then consensus #3 WW. One of those is not like the other. 4. While Bradley has a deep resume which one of those fighters you listed were actual WW's 5. Since fighters like Ortiz losing 3/4 years before getting a big fight bothers you how do you feel about Pacquiao consistantly fighting fighters directly off losses not 3/4 years before but within 12 months or 1/2 fights before.
Bradley only beat Pac when you're hyping Bradley.. Pac beat Bradley twice when you're hyping Pac.. When you're dissing Floyd, the first fight is ignored, and the second fight is hyped as if Bradley beat someone else to be top P4P...
I dont know how those guys could be seen as the biggest threat to floyd, I dont put as much stock in fighting several welterweight fights as you do if the standard of fighter is the same but Gurerro flew up 2 weight classes and beat berto which doesnt exacly mean anything signifigant especially since it was a tight enough fight, ortiz has been thought by most to have lost to peterson before he fought berto who bradley actually beat, in regards to bradleys welterweight resume thats true yeah but the others dont have anyone on their resume what your saying about pacquio ,I care more about who the loses where too rather than an empty win