Why does AJ pick on old men

Unification, mandatory, mandatory(replacement), mandatory, very late replacement, and Ngannou beat the so call WBC Champion at that time.
Why do AJ haters close their eyes for the facts, though???
Povetkin was also top 4 at the time he faced AJ. Pulev had 1 lose to Klitschko only, and was in top 10.

Also liars and trolls like you should be straight up banned for baiting:
Povetkin has just turned 39 when he fought AJ, he was not 40.
Takam was 36, not 39.
Pulev was 39, not 40.
Helenius was 39 as well.
Ngannou is still 37, so i didn't know AJ fight him in the future. Another lie by you.

 

So why dont you explain who the replacements should have been to be worthy of your praise

 

He is fighting Dubois next who is 26

 

Because anyone with some life in them will chin him off

Hurgovic, bakole, dubious, nathan gorman.

 

Younger ones make him look ordinary.
(Parker 26, Ruiz 29, Franklin 29)

Except he did well against Otto Wallin (a year younger than AJ) and is apparently about to face Dubois!

I will be quite impressed if he KOs Dubois.
Dubois been stopped by older men twice before, but he's still improving.
Dubois should actually beat Joshua.

 

He fought young undefeated champion Parker. He fought young undefeated Whyte. He fought young undefeated belt holder Charles Godwalker Martin(is what it is). He fought young fat Andy with only one loss to Parker in a world title fight. As far as I remember he fought a young and undefeated top 10 Brezeale.
And let's be honest - old Wlad is a better win than any young undefeated fighter at that time bar Fury.

 

Haha.

 

What about the rest then? Just gonna blatantly ignore all the others?

Wallinn - 33
Franklin - 29
Ruiz twice - 29
Usyk - 34/35
Breazeale - 30
Parker - 26
Whyte - 27
Martin - 26

 

funny thing is that list shits all over Fury’s Resume

 

Take out his losses and thats a very poor list of wins. All the good wins were all old guys?

 

"Very poor", really?

Ok so take away Usyk.....

Still has wins over Whyte, Parker, Wallinn and Ruiz? All top 10 world contenders bar Whyte who later became 1.

We can just as much sit here and say Parker's best wins have come against old guys too?

 

Parker is a good win. But none of those other guys really did anything of note.

 

Then it shows you the state of the heavyweight division then doesn't it? That they'd all been in positions in the top 10 to fight for a world title whilst doing nothing of note.

Povetkin was 8-0 since Wlad before he met AJ, when did you want him to fight Povetkin, when he was a novice with 10 fights or something?

 

Just go away already, mate. Seriously. You have been the loudest Fury nuthugger here for years and Fury was hurt and beaten up by Usyk much worse than Joshua was ever by anyone. The only thing you should be posting, if anything, is being humble and apologetic for your behaviour and posting history over the years. You are more shameless than the Furys which is quite something.

If you can't shut it, just go away already.