Why Does Broner Get Watched Under Such A Big Microscope?

More than a bit.

Matthysse and Provodnikov could probably even give Marquez, Bradley and Pacquiao 'trouble', whether you think they would win or not. To say they wouldn't give Broner 'trouble', who had 'trouble' with Quintero, Ponce, Paulie and Maidana is ludicrous.

 

broner had more than just trouble with them 4, he should have lost :good

I would be surprised if Broner saw the halfway point against Matthysse or Provodnikov.

 

He thinks 140 is the weight for Broner. There is Garcia, Matthyssse, Provodnokov. These are the guys at 140 and I do not see Broner beating any of these guys. Broner is built like a tank and weights heavy on fight night yet he's not a welter. :rofl:rofl His weight is 135 were his huge ass dwarfs other guys and their punches bounces of him.:deal

 

Oh god, a person who actually believes in CIS privilege. Wow. WOW
Let me guess, you also support multiculturalism, feminism & gay rights?

You, my friend are completely ****ing ******ed, and the world is going downhill because of people who think like you.

From what I gathered you're german, so I guess it all makes sense

 

What haterz does Broner have man, what you talking about? Anyways, Broner simply talked the talk and couldn't walk the walk. He was full of bull**** and Maidana was the one inserting the enema. Not the first time Maidana has exposed a supposed future superstar. And this kid was being hyped BIG as in Delahoya, Mayweather, Pacman superstar level BIG. Can't blame GBP tho. If Canelo and Broner hadn't fought Floyd and Maidana, their hype would be even worse. This is good tho, so they know what to expect and how high the bar is raised for them to reach that level. Getting humbled is the best thing to happen to them.

 

I still think Broner has some skills and can bounce back if he were to stat taking boxing more serious. The ****iness and brashness doesn't bother me but you still have to back it up. Last night, he didn't have a plan b, c,d, or e and it showed. He got beat by a more determined fighter. Broner to me is not a brawler, he fought the wrong fight. honestly, I think he parties to much. Boxing is a very disciplined sport, and whether people like it or not, Mayweather demonstrates this totally and Broner is nowhere close to Mayweather. Broner talks big, so people want to see and every move he makes will be under a microscope,

 

Broner made the microscope. He's a **** talker. So people pay attention. Isn't that what he wants?

 

Not too hard to convince me of irrefutable facts, yeah. You in denial? You are either ignorant or..

...all right, nevermind. You forgot to check in @ Stormfront today? "Oh I so wish this was the 1950s again. What's with all these people having equal rights to me now??". :|

 

Umm.. Haters gonna hate!

 

If you consider blog posts made irrefutable facts, then I wish you luck in life. Please give me proof of these facts,- I'll gladly read them. From what I know CIS/white privilege is a concept brought forth in sociology/women's studies, and it is by no means accepted as a irrefutable fact in the scientific community. They are theories (I hope you know what the term "theory" means)

Last time I checked success in life was based on merit, not on race/ethnicity. Who works/tries the hardest gets the most out of life. I'm not sure whether you're aware that people of Asian origin have the most income out of all the races (and COINCIDENTALLY they also have the highest standardized test scores). Is that Asian privilege?

The views you have are typical of someone who never took the time to think for themselves/read into subjects (we both know you're just repeating **** you've heard somewhere),- you settled on regurgitating whatever you hear from the TV.

And from what I've seen from you- you are the one bringing race into every single discussion. I think you're more racist than most here, Hans. And in addition to that you're also an ignorant socialist with no views of his own.

 

So you need scientific evidence to prove that being a White male in today's society provides you an advantage? I can assure you first hand that I would not have had the same opportunities if I wasn't white. I can speak from my own personal experience and the experiences of those around me. Maybe in your make believe world this isn't the case. Who works/tries the hardest gets the most out of life. Interesting, that sounded good, but I'm sure that you don't really believe that....

 

^This pretty much sums it up.

 

Yes I do, because abstract statements and personal experiences do not constitute any kind of proof. There are people of all races who got where they are because of their drive to succeed, work and intellectual capacity. There are also people of all races that are basically useless, unmotivated idiots. Race has nothing to do with success- as success is based entirely in personal factors. Race was a factor years ago, but in today's society achievement is mostly merit based. Let's not pretend we live in times of segregation/extreme discrimination. The fact is that everyone gets what they deserve. And what you and your friend label as "racial privilege" is in reality a complex mix of factors entirely based in personal capacity to succeed. Affirmative action and stupid **** like that creates a victim complex in groups and it results in a racial divide. It's easy to blame others for everything instead of being a realist and accepting that only you are the architect of your life

 

I think that guy's either a *** or a non ethnic german and he'd like a medal for that.
Democracy = power of the majority

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY

CK sums it all up.