Why does Brook get a pass!??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jmashyaka, Sep 15, 2016.


  1. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,155
    38,364
    Jan 22, 2015
    He did... geez you are an idiot.. my goodness. Brook has been calling him out since 2014 after he won the IBF strap. :detenido:
     
  2. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Lool give it up this guy is nuts I'm telling you, in his eyes no such thing as ducking.
     
  3. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,155
    38,364
    Jan 22, 2015
    Goodness.. YDKSAB... I'm Done With You, You Don't Wet My appetite.
     
  4. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    well i look at the 154lb division and see andrade and lara who i think brook would struggle with, apart from that i dont see much else, the charlos are being majorly overrated, neither has any significant win.. jermalls is austin trout lol and jermells is probably martiroysan lol
     
  5. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    But both Charlos opponents beat Porter who brook struggled with. Brook has one good win on his resume not sure why you act like his this proven dude. You will see Brook will not be able to get a belt at 154 if someone solid holds it.
     
  6. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    I would agree with you but Hearn he would make it for Khan? So he can make it in that case, he made it for bizier and Gavin too.
     
  7. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    jermalls resume is shocking am i missing something? jermells i ok i guess martiroysan isn't too bad but not great. jermall ha fought absolutely nobody he beat bundrage for the title for christs sake. Believe me brook will beat both of those guys, he will struggle with andrade though and lara but lara aint getting any big fights. Him v canelo was the most boring fight iv ever watched lol
     
  8. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Trout and martirosyan both beat Porter in my opinion so I don't know how you can **** on them without saying that Brooks resume is extremely poor?
     
  9. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    mayweather also made 130 at apoint in his life. Can somebody not outgrow a division?? remember he'l of put a little bit of muscle on for the golovkin fight, he already struggled.Dom said for the porter fighter they had to have him on a specific diet for the porter fight to take muscle off him (i'd assume a low protein low carb diet)... losing muscle to fight i surely not a good idea??
     
  10. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,350
    Mar 11, 2016
    If you read it, you'd see I was agreeing on Khan duckin brook for Algieri. F*ckin drama queen.
     
  11. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    Its always tough to compare fighters through divisions and say theyd beat them, if you ask me as a fighter who are better i'd say shawn porter 100%. Martiroysans best win is probaby ishe smith lol.. trout is cotto which is decent but as i said earlier hes finished and too small for 154..

    I never said brooks resume was great but his resumes is better than jermalls resume, easily. He has fought absolutely nobody, i can't even believe he got a title shot, did he become mandatory??
     
  12. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Depends losing muscle sometimes is coz muscle can make you to stiff so for some fighters sure but generally not, but let's go with your logic that it always is if that's what your saying why are they willing to do it for a fight with Khan. It no longer even sells much anymore.
     
  13. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    brook v khan would make both millions of pounds, it would be a huge fight in the UK.. this is why he would attempt to make 147 for amir khan. Money. Khan also just fought at 155, how do we know they couldnt agree on a catchweight, 150? heck maybe amirs stupid and would agree to 154 ... he's also wanted the fight badly for years and years. Overs 5 years, ofcourse he'd attempt to make it. When there millions on the table you don't leave it
     
  14. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Jesus Christ how can a resume of only porter be better than Trout and mundine? Trout would school porter. Yes he was a mandatory, how did brook become a mandatory by fighting guys like Jones and senchenko who both rocked him.
     
  15. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    They specifically said he would go to 147 for Khan, and with Khans ego he would never fight brook at 154 or 150, he would wanna drain him down. I personally the demand is there for that fight anymore coz it's no longer competitive.