Why does calzaghes resume get bagged, but roy jones gets a pass?

the eyeball test ends the argument.

All you have to do is open your eyes and watch some prime Jones.

 

Yep, mostly this is true.

 

But not in this case.

Roy's resume is far superior.

When Roy was 34, he was a four weight champ, and was considered the best fighter on the planet.

When Joe was 34, he was fighting Peter Manfredo from The Contender, to gain U.S. exposure.

Regards, Loudon.

 

strange that joe pulled out of the tito vs oscar undercard being injured. as he fought reid on the same night back in the UK. it was part of the same pay-per-view.

 

yeah, he did fight a past prime eubank, but he was still a very good fighter. calzaghe had never been anywhere near that level. joe was meant to fight collins, but he retired so eubank was brought in.

joe never fought any of the belt holders because they were afraid of him. when they lost the title they came running like rats. it wasn't until lacy and kessler called him out (something no one had done before) that the fights happened right away. funny that isn't it?

ottke had said many times that he wasn't interested in fighting joe. he knew he would of lost to him. joe would of went to germany to fight him.

:huh when was joe kicked off sky sports? i know that people can't get any facts right when it comes to joe, but this is a new one.
they never showed the rematch with veit because he had already blown him away. but veit was the number 1 contender. it was fight veit or lose the belt. the fight took place in germany because they had won the purse bids.
the only other time joe never fought on sky was when FW took his whole stable to ITV. that had nothing to do with joe.

he wasn't told to **** off by sky sports. FW moved his stable to ITV you dickhead.

that last bit has been done to death hundreds of times already. nobody seems to take any of the facts on board. a bit like yourself .

 

:-( he wasn't dropped by ITV. FW moved his stable back to sky.

why can't anybody get anything right when it comes to calzaghe?

it's just morons after morons.

 

:rofl:rofl collins retired in 1997 you ****ing idiot. you're an embarrassment.

 

on that last piece: joe did have that in him but they wouldn't fight him for **** sake. it wasn't his fault that hopkins and jones were both *****.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl atsch DUH!!

 

joe clowned jones just the way jones had clowned many of his opponents. he didn't knock him out because he had brittle hands.

 

you agree because you're as clueless as he is. :deal

first class moron. :deal

 

the fight between benn and jones would of never happened. because jones is a coward. that's just the truth of it. :deal

 

the video was edited to look like that. go and watch the full fights to see that it's BS.

 

Yup very true !

And for anyone thinking that the Hopkins that Joe faced was a better version well ,he had lost *reviously to JT ,after losing to Roy he didn't lose until he fought JT ..So to say he was actually better is stretch because he was closer to his prime when he fought Roy then when he fought Joe !

 

say what? the hopkins that joe beat was a hundred times better than the one roy beat. using the taylor excuse doesn't wash my man. and hopkins did lose after jones. his name was segundo mercado. that wasn't a draw. hopkins also got put down by the guy. so stop talking crap.

i prefer the klittards and the *******s to the americans. the reason being that they have an excuse as they don't have much knowledge outside of these fighters. the americans have all this knowledge at their fingertips. but they still refuse the facts. it's for this reason that makes this site such a **** hole. i've never seen so many morons in one place before. ****ing sad.