Why does Crawford have 0 good wins?

Don't look at me, I never rated postol. You can check my old comments. I never was in postol's wagon, NEVER. I always thought (and I still think) that he's overrated AF.

 

Nope, man you really are trying though,

Instead of Obsessing over me you might just want to PM one of the Mods to feed your curiosity, saying it for the third time,

Keep simping & i might just let you know what my favorite color is, Good luck.

 

I already did.. CHECK MATE!

 

Gamboa at that particular time was viewed as vulnerable. And he moved up in weight. I don’t remember him being favored here. But I do remember Postol being hyped to the moon when he beat Matthysse. He was forgotten instantly after losing to Crawford.

 

Postol was a good win. But yeah, hard to think he is going to be 37 and somehow ranked top 3 P4P with that resume....

 

Because this is modern boxing. Where a P4P list across an entire sport with each of the 18 divisions containing 30-40 unique names in their top "10" rankings spots 6ish-10 are basically participation trophies. (thus far at least)

 

I thought so until his performance against Taylor, he definitely gave Taylor issues.

 

Correct—Few gave Bud a chance with VP

 

lmao at 35 year old crawford "waiting out" 32 year old spence