Why does Crawford have 0 good wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by miniq, Oct 22, 2022.


  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,372
    16,541
    Dec 6, 2008
    Gamboa at that particular time was viewed as vulnerable. And he moved up in weight. I don’t remember him being favored here. But I do remember Postol being hyped to the moon when he beat Matthysse. He was forgotten instantly after losing to Crawford.
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,832
    4,060
    May 4, 2012
    Postol was a good win. But yeah, hard to think he is going to be 37 and somehow ranked top 3 P4P with that resume....
     
  3. SomeFella

    SomeFella Member Full Member

    157
    166
    Aug 10, 2020
    Because this is modern boxing. Where a P4P list across an entire sport with each of the 18 divisions containing 30-40 unique names in their top "10" rankings spots 6ish-10 are basically participation trophies. (thus far at least)
     
  4. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,442
    14,684
    Feb 28, 2016
    I thought so until his performance against Taylor, he definitely gave Taylor issues.
     
  5. Bustajay

    Bustajay Feel the Steel/Balls Deep Full Member

    33,796
    14,068
    Dec 9, 2012
    Correct—Few gave Bud a chance with VP
     
  6. Cage

    Cage Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,308
    2,739
    Jan 4, 2005
    lmao at 35 year old crawford "waiting out" 32 year old spence