Why Does Dempsey Get Bashed For Not Fighting Wills, but not Jeffries for Johnson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by C. M. Clay II, Jul 10, 2007.


  1. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    It really baffles me. Many here make a big deal about Dempsey not fighting harry Wills and he suffers in the all-time rankings (some even rate Wills over him), but almost no one even mentions Jim Jeffries blatantly ducking Johnson when Jeffries was in his prime, and many even rank Jeffries over Johnson:admin ! Why?

    Dempsey didn't duck Wills, he tried to get a fight between him and Wills twice and both times it fell through because of mitigating circumstances, and the politics of the time. Dempsey even went to a contract signing and he and Wills both signed a contract to fight. Dempsey tried the best he could, but when he realized it would be near impossible to go over, he abandoned the idea, but he did give it his best shot. Harry Wills even said later that it wasn't Dempsey's fault he didn't get the title shot.

    However, Jeffries drew the color line like no other. Johnson was more highly thought of in 1904 than Wills was in 1925, but Jeffries avoided Jack like the plague. even prominent newspapers like The Police Gazette, which was the Ring magazine of it's day wrote articles stating it's ignorance of the reason for Jeffries drawing the color line. Jeffries kept saying that same dumb line over and over again, "I'll never put my title on a line against a black. Never have, never will." When you are fighting guys like Jack Munroe and Jack Finnegan, then the color line thing becomes kind of tired, don't you think? Even Jeffries trainer Bob Delaney admitted that Jeffries was terrified of Johnson during his title reign, and avoided even coming into contact with him whenever he could.

    So which sounds worse?:bbb
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,026
    Jun 30, 2005
    Jeffries' was worse, but it fortunately came near the end of his career rather than the beginning. And ultimately, he took a massive thrashing from Johnson when he was old (so I guess you can't feel that resentful of his earlier ducking).

    I would rate Jeffries higher than Johnson, but he did duck him.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,858
    47,780
    Mar 21, 2007
    Basically, Johnson did get to fight for the title, and eventually even fight Jeffries - so the wrong was set right.

    When an injustice takes place, someone has to swing for it. Rightly, or wrongly that somebody is Dempsey.

    And there's something in it. There's a lot of talk about what Dempsey did to try to make the fight happen and I beleive most of it - but he still didn't fight him. They could have done it, of that i'm sure.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,533
    27,143
    Feb 15, 2006
    Dempsey clearly made far more effort to defend his title against Wills than Jeffries did against Johnson. Perhaps more efort than he needed to.

    The irony is that Jack Johnson would only have loped off the tail of Jeffries career had he beaten him. By the same token Peter Jackson only stood to trim off the tip of Sullivans career.

    It would therfore have made little diference to their legacies if they had lost and would have greatly enhanced them had they won. Dempsey for contrast would have met Wills bang in the middle of his career.
     
  5. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Dempsey was not particularly liked by some, he was cricitized for dodging the draft for World War I (but fought with honour in the second World War).

    Jeffries was the closest the White Americans got to John L in popularity...

    So when the careers of each fighter were being written there was a bias against Dempsey.
     
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,026
    Jun 30, 2005
    You know, that's a good point...Johnson can be held to the same standard as Jeffries for ducking black challengers after he won the title. Both were great fighters regardless.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,858
    47,780
    Mar 21, 2007
    But Johnson had already taken on most of those boys.

    So whilst he can be cricised as CHAMPION, and his moral courage can be questioned (if you yourself are feeling brave) his resume is less susceptable to attack.
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,026
    Jun 30, 2005
    Recently, I believe a couple of discovered fights were posted that showed Jeffries fought some of the top black contenders of his era (pre-Johnson). I don't recall the particulars...do you?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,858
    47,780
    Mar 21, 2007
    No...my Jeffries knowledge is limited to what Janitor tells me plus the photos I have of him on his tractor (which I really like for some reason).
     
  10. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    I disagree. Jeffries was still at his peak when he retired. He was 29 during his last defense, and retired only because there were no more white challengers left, and because IMO he realized that eventually Johnson would have to get a title shot, so he high-tailed it out of there before that could possibly happen. If the fight took place in 1905 like it should have, Johnson would have fought Jim Jeffries at his positive peak.:good
     
  11. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,635
    Sep 13, 2006
    Jeffries screwed up by not fighting Johnson in 1905 because that was when he would have most likely defeated him. If he wasn't going to fight him then, he never should have done so. People can say race honor all they want, but the real reason he came back in 1910 was the money - it simply was too much to turn down - an unprecedented and unparallelled amount.

    Besides the color line, the other reason he did not fight Johnson in 1905 was because there simply wasn't enough money in it. That is because not many experts or writers thought Johnson would win. Also, Johnson's style was boring. Therefore, a less than intriguing matchup meant a small purse. This was particularly so after Johnson lost a close decision to Marvin Hart. That essentially killed any fever for the fight. So, Jeff retired.
     
  12. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Number one, I never said Tyson was shot at 24. Number two, Jeffries was in his prime when he retired. He was just as sharp according to many accounts of his last fight against Munroe. Maybe he wasn't afraid of Johnson himself, but he was afraid of losing his title to Johnson. When he made the comeback in 1910, he had nothing to lose and everything to gain.:good
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    Jeffries returned to give Johnson a title match many years after he was retired. Many boxing people still considered Jeffires to be the champion in those days because he never lost his title in the ring. As a contender Johnson was only viewed as the #1 guy at the tail end of Jeffires career. Jeffires retired because there was not enough money in the fighting game. Jeffries did say he’d fight Marvin Hart, who defeated Johnson if the public wanted to see it. I suppose if the money was the same as it was in 1910, Jeffries would have fought Johnson. In prize fighting money always talks.

    I think Wills was the #1 rated guy for many years of Dempsey’s title reign, so I would pick him. However the answer to who avoided the best black fighters as champion ironically is Jack Johnson. As champion, Johnson avoided talented black fighters like, Sam Langford, Joe Jeanette, and Sam McVea. The three men were most certainly viewed as the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd contenders from 1908-1915. Johnson shut them out. The all time coldest line in history is Joe Jeanette saying after Johnson won the title he drew the color line against this own people.
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,146
    Aug 26, 2004
    Johnson never fought a Black challenger either and the reason was the same as the rest( the money was not there)
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    Jack Johnson had an obscure fight in Paris vs Black journeyman Jim Battling Johnson. Many of the top black fighters of the day fought in France. Jack had an expensive life style, so when he needed money he gave Battling Jim a chance at his title. It was the first all black lineal title match.

    Unfortunetly the fight was a fiasco. Jack Johnson hurt his arm and had to retire inside the scheduled 20 rounds. The crowd booed. There was some debate as to who won the fight.Two judges had it as a draw after 10 rounds, the other had Battling Jim in the lead. Since Jack retired, it should have gone as a TKO in the books, however the heavyweight championship of the world was Jack Johnson’s show. After some debate the official ruling was a draw. There was no re-match.