Why does everyone say SRR was the best of all time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nawfal, Aug 26, 2007.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    When did I say that I saw Sugar Ray Robinson fight live? I'm not even old enough to remember seeing S inugar Ray Leonard in his prime. According to Tyson fans, I was only 5 when Tyson's prime ended.
     
  2. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    Fair enough! About SRR and Greb? I was saying Robinson was the best,. didnt know if you were arguing if Greb was?
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,146
    Oct 22, 2006
    Everybody is influenced and make their opinions on judgements they have read or listened to. You rely on opinions of others to judge the fight and whatever spin they want to put into their opinion. You accept some and not others, but your opinion on many subjects will be a mish-mash of other people's opinions.
     
  4. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    " Most people have not seen SRR fight live in his prime which can make judgeing his greatness difficult"

    Thats what you said pal, just thought it was funny, made it out like you had seen him prime time!:lol:
     
  5. Nawfal

    Nawfal Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,675
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    i do agree with this, but most of the time people use others to help them guide an opinion. with no footage of prime srr of his opponents, i find it difficult to come up with a reliable opinion on it myself, considering i didnt even exist when he was in his prime.
     
  6. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Robinson is almost undisputably the #1 greatest of all time.

    He isn't the best though.
     
  7. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    Good point, probably have him the same, maybe Armstrong 3rd, poss Saddler 4th, but hey, its all subjective!
     
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Everyone has flaws, I was obviously kidding.

    But Jordan was no more of a ballhog than anyone else who scored like he did, and his shooting percentage is very high for a shooting guard. He was abusive, but also elevated his teamates play, and his 3 point shooting was average, not bad at all, just not good.
     
  9. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Yes. I believe he would be very marginally better were he around today too.
     
  10. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    SRR would probably desstry any WW around today, even PB!
     
  11. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Yes, if he were trained in the modern times. But judging from his footage alone, absolutely not.
     
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I find this insulting.
     
  13. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    Bull ****, what, floyd would run for 15 rounds and get a decision? he would get pounded everytime he tried a jab!:lol:
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    His shooting percentage was high becasue he drove to the hoop alot. He didn't start hitting that mid range jumper until later in his career. Until Phil Jackson got there, the biggest knock on Jordan was that he didn't make his teammates better. For his career Jordan was 33% percent 3 point shooter and he was under 20% every year for the first 3 to 4 years of his career. None of this really has much to do with the thread topic anyway. Except that it shows that people have an inflated opinion of Jordan. The same could be true in regards to SRR
     
  15. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    No, actually Floyd would just rip him to pieces. Ray's hands are far too low and he's also too squared up at all times, even with the best timing ever, he's open to be brutalised. But of course, this was the inferior style, I am not saying he's an inferior physical specimen or era/era fighter, because on that notion, he is technically the best ever.

    His speed is also nowhere near Floyd's for that matter, on top of massive technical issue's.