Why does everyone think Bradley lost round 5 on the cards?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012.


Page 2 of 3
  1. busstonedfx

    busstonedfx Active Member Full Member

    536
    0
    May 14, 2011
    He said it in an interview after the fight. Not in his corner, during the fight
     
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    #16
  2. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    this is the correct way to score that round/thread
     
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    #17
  3. Flyin Ryan

    Flyin Ryan Active Member Full Member

    1,289
    0
    Apr 17, 2006
    So you as a guy that watched from thousands of miles away on a small TV and/or laptop screen think you know better than the guy that was in the ring throwing and receiving punches?

    This poster folks demonstrates why Eastside Boxing is such a dumb**** message board.
     
    Flyin Ryan, Jun 11, 2012
    Flyin Ryan, Jun 11, 2012
    #18
  4. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Scoring Punch's mean scoring punch's. I agree with ya as well. When will these Judge's and im over it, stop giving fights to fighters who throw more punch's than the opponent. Its seems to be were the sport of boxing and judging a fight is going.

    They are rewarding output not contact.
     
    BoppaZoo, Jun 11, 2012
    BoppaZoo, Jun 11, 2012
    #19
  5. larryx2012

    larryx2012 I AM BETTER THEN YOU Full Member

    12,523
    33
    May 24, 2012
    yea Bradley won that round
     
    larryx2012, Jun 11, 2012
    larryx2012, Jun 11, 2012
    #20
  6. Flyin Ryan

    Flyin Ryan Active Member Full Member

    1,289
    0
    Apr 17, 2006
    Yes.
     
    Flyin Ryan, Jun 11, 2012
    Flyin Ryan, Jun 11, 2012
    #21
  7. busstonedfx

    busstonedfx Active Member Full Member

    536
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Oh, I didn't realize you were the referee, or a corner man, or were ringside...dick... as a matter of fact, sometimes I think that us, watching on TV, have a better view of the reality of the situation... we are unbiased? and see things in slow mo, and from multiple angles?

    2 of the judges that scored the fight for Bradley also gave him round 5. They were ringside.

    Bradley thinks he won the fight. So he and I are in agreement. He was in the ring. You were not.
    I was just commenting on why ppl gave Pac round 5. Which I didn't. And neither did 2 judges
     
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    #22
  8. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    the thing is, they cant even be rewarding output, considering that manny outlanded him in total punches, power punches, and jabs, not to mention landing at a higher percentage as well. ROBBERY. there's no basis whatsoever for rewarding bradley any more than two rounds, let alone the ****ing win.
     
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    #23
  9. busstonedfx

    busstonedfx Active Member Full Member

    536
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Well judges see punches thrown, sometimes in live action, from their immobile seat on one side of the ring, it's tough to see what lands cleanly and what doesn't..
    Workrate pays off- you throw 50 punches, and land about half of them... or you throw 30 punches and land 25 of them... to a judge watching live action, maybe the one who threw 50 punches, might have landed more too... to the naked eye
     
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    busstonedfx, Jun 11, 2012
    #24
  10. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    I agree when you get hit by your opponent 80 more times by Power shots that were effective scoring shots and you are clearly hurt 3 times in the fight.

    You shouldnt be rewarded because of how brave or how many you threw.
    agree it was far worse than the Pac vs JMM fights. Because all of them were close.

    Like i have said if expert Boxing writers and people that have more knowledge than us are scoring the fight 118-110 to Pac yet 2 70 year old ring side judges who probably both wear glass's score it 115-113 at ringside for Bradley there is something bigger at work.
     
    BoppaZoo, Jun 11, 2012
    BoppaZoo, Jun 11, 2012
    #25
  11. SpeedKills

    SpeedKills Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    1,070
    Jan 7, 2009
    pacquiao won round 5 clearly
     
    SpeedKills, Jun 11, 2012
    SpeedKills, Jun 11, 2012
    #26
  12. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    cool story bro....tell it again. I cant take you seriously. you think bradley beat pacquiao.
     
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    #27
  13. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    yup...senility or the fix. one of the two
     
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    m8te, Jun 11, 2012
    #28
  14. wooz

    wooz Active Member Full Member

    885
    4
    May 4, 2008
    If this was amateur scoring Bradley would have less than 5 points during the whole 12 rounds. The quality of Bradleys punches is horrible, measuring the range with jab to Pacquiaos gloves all night. :rofl
     
    wooz, Jun 11, 2012
    wooz, Jun 11, 2012
    #29
  15. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Bradley won the round, Pac landed one clean punch the whole round while making Bradley look like Pernell Whitaker in the last minute.
     
    dealt_with, Jun 11, 2012
    dealt_with, Jun 11, 2012
    #30
Page 2 of 3