Why does nobody ever seem to mention duran's loss at lightweight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sage, Jul 21, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :happy :happy
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Interesting. I did see Laguna's win over Carlos Ortiz a while back, but don't remember too much. I'd like to watch more of him.
     
  3. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    This is something that was unmistakable watching Laguna who also did this beautifully. He would just drop his body weight to avoid punches and like Duran would punch on his way back up, using his legs to shift his weight into his punch. This technique leaves opponents in awkward positions after missing and also leaves them having to deal with punches coming from awkward angles.

    Before the 3rd Carlos Ortiz and Ismael Laguna fight Laguna can be seen doing this in the ring while shadow boxing.
     
  4. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    As if Floyd would beat any of those guys at that weight, or even fight them. Duran should get more credit for stepping into the ring with them than he should criticism for losing.

    His best weight was 135lbs people.
     
  5. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    IMO Duran and Whitaker have a lot in common. Both were four weight world champs, lightweight greats, and their defensive abilities were tremendous even though entirely different in how they went about their business in that regard.

    Duran springs to mind as a come forward brawler, with Whitaker a speedy southpaw rubix cube. Whitaker you aint solving the first time, try again and again, then you might solve him. Yet both are extremely underrated in the categorys the other is strong in. Duran for his defense and boxing ability and Whitaker for his inside fighting and toughness.
     
  6. Sage

    Sage Active Member Full Member

    522
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    To play devils advocate and to illustrate what i mean, lets take a Floyd mayweather vs duran head to head match up.



    One of the things you will commonly hear is this:


    "Floyd had great trouble in the first fight against Jose Luis Castillo who was a skilled pressure fighter, Duran is a far superior boxer and pressure fighter and would overwhelm mayweather and take a comfortable victory"


    Nothing wrong with such a statement at all, in fact, its more then likely the above scenario would occur.


    And yet, one of the things you will never, ever hear (or at least i have never heard) is this:


    "Esteban De Jesus showed that on the right night, duran can be susceptible to being outboxed by a skilled, slick boxer. Since floyd is a superior boxer to de jesus, there is a chance, albeit no a huge one, that floyd could outslick and outbox Duran to a close decision victory"



    Now, were the above scenario to happen, the response/defense argument would typically be:

    "Duran was green"
    "he had an off night"
    "He thrashed De jesus in a rematch"


    ect


    And yet, it would probably be far more unacceptable to say on the flip side about floyd in his first fight against castillo:

    "He fought hurt"
    "He was injurted"
    "He won the rematch convincingly"





    As i said earlier, contrary to what you may think i am not hating on duran, personally, i just feel he gets a bit of a free pass here IMO.





    Sage
     
  7. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Who of those would you favor Floyd over?

    I dont see why those loses should need excuses, they are losses against some of the greatest ever at those weights. And not to mention one great win over SRL, who IMO is the 2nd best welter ever h2h.
     
  8. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
     
  9. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    SRR.
     
  10. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    He gets the free pass because he later destroyed De Jesus in the rematches. It wasn't like De Jesus was a washed up scrub by the time they rematched. Their third fight was a unification as De Jesus had the WBA belt at the time.

    What's criminal is that Esteban De Jesus never gets mentioned. If it hadn't been for Duran - he would have ruled lightweight.
     
  11. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    joe calzaghe, what?
     
  12. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Middleweight is very debatable (some of the classic guys would definently say Monzon, Hagler, etc), but its hard to debate it at welter. Even though the footage doesn´t exist, the accounts and track record beyond welter are substantial enough. I would like to get my hands on the full Docusen fight... have seen a 3 minute or so clip of it.
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    De Jesus held the WBC title when they fought the third time. Duran was the WBA champion.
     
  14. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    The fights I want are the Robinson - Kid Gavilan fights. Those are the lost classics of boxing. . .
     
  15. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    What I would do for those... especially the 1st.