Why does size matter?

"All things wouldn't be equal in real life" isn't a sufficient answer for:

"That is unrealistic because in boxing things are never equal. Two fighters never punch with the same power, never have the same speed, never specialize in the same punches, never have the same chin, never THINK the same, never move the same.

It is literally impossible for two fighters to have the same punching power yet punch with the same technique and speed yet weigh differently."

From there on I didn't answer anything you said until you answered mine which came first. That is common practice. If you don't want to do that then don't argue with me. If we argue we go through each one by order of which they were asked. Not all of your first then ignore mine/give a stupid response.

Everyone seems to get that here but you.

 

When I said I never started with the demeaning talk I was talking about posters other than yourself. Please read and respond to what I actually right. You are projecting and I have no time for mental cases.

Yes there is something for you to get over because you said you were hurt in a way I wouldn't understand. That doesn't mean you weren't hurt it means you were hurt just in a way you claim I don't understand. So yes I was responding to what you wrote. Again, you are in the wrong.

This is a forum about boxing not about demonstrating your level of pseudo intellectualism. I am sure you have better things to do than to sit here and argue with me.

 

Read through the pages I have already said it somewhere.

In case you didn't read the OP.

 

Extreme hypocrisy with you.

It is common practice when arguing; to make a claim > other guy responds and makes a counterclaim(optional)> repeat step two.

You learned this in high school english (I'm assuming you went to high school as most people do).

Again, I am following correct argumentative procedure you are not. Other people on this thread have been as well. You have not.

 

Lol I don't get upset on the internet. I take some things on here with a grain of salt.

The bolded is false.

If you didn't learn about rhetorical arguments in high school then I am sorry. You had an inferior education. That can be expected because most people on here went to high school in the 20th century and while nothing is wrong with that, the education system has advanced ten fold. For instance Columbus no longer thought the world was flat.

 

A comma makes a difference. For instance:

The servant pleasured, his lord angrily yelling

is a lot different from

The servant pleasured his lord angrily yelling