Why does Tyson get credit for getting knocked out? ATG chin???n

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Glass City Cobra, Jul 6, 2017.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    "chin" isnt just about standing and taking it, that went out 2 centuries ago.

    if you neglect to use the entirety of your chin (defending and then responding to being hit) then you may as well just roll over and quit.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    People have different definitions of "chin".

    Obviously to someone who ranks Tyson's chin as a model of all-time great chins, "chin" simply means being able to remain on your feet after taking a big punch.

    I disagree with that definition, since fighters can be "out on their feet" and that's due to their punch resistance being penetrated too.
    Tyson was very often out on his feet in a sheer fog in those fights where he was beaten, and doing very little to fight back.

    He had a very good chin. Not an ATG chin.
    A very good chin at heavyweight is a pretty big deal though.
     
  3. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,075
    4,896
    Jun 24, 2017
    So you are also saying that by the facts, Ruiz hit harder than Tyson and Lewis (why did you only include Tyson?)and Cooper hit harder than Liston, Foreman and Shavers?

    A simple yes or no answer ?
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I'm saying by the facts he hurt Tyson more than Holyfield did and Cooper hurt Ali more than those 3 did, am I right or am I right?
     
  5. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,075
    4,896
    Jun 24, 2017
    F**k! Wass1885, Are you that dumb? You taking my quotes about Toney and Ruiz, facts I posted as examples and trying to present them as your own?
     
    richdanahuff and superman1986 like this.
  6. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,707
    2,887
    Aug 12, 2012
    Tyson most certainly does NOT have an ATG chin, a good chin yes, but not an ATG one.
     
    Wass1985 likes this.
  7. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,962
    4,844
    Feb 25, 2012
    An atg chin is almost freakish. Guys like mcall are out of the ordinary. But i dont think tysons chin was too far off. Not atg but very very good. His chin was pretty much the last thing to go in the stoppage losses.
     
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Very good post.
     
    superman1986 and bbjc like this.
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Also a very good post.
     
  10. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,601
    Dec 10, 2014
    I have never heard anyone said Tyson had "the greatest chin of all time."

    He did have a very good chin though

    Partly supporting your argument with citing the number of times he was kod is flawed

    Context is everything and from 85-02 he was only stopped twice, by Douglas and Holyfield. And he took tons of big shots in both fights before losing.
     
  11. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    What the fcuk are you babbling on about?
     
  12. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,601
    Dec 10, 2014
    Holyfield was basiclaly shot when he fought Ruiz and Toney.

    Did it occur to you that there are varying versions of any fighter. The shot versions do not possess the same attributes of the more prime version.
     
    Wass1985 likes this.
  13. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,601
    Dec 10, 2014
     
  14. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    This!
     
  15. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,645
    36,230
    Jan 8, 2017
    I believe what jacks trying to put across is.. Because one fighter is hurt by another.. Then that fighter goes on to meet another guy who doesn't hurt him but is a better all round fighter.. Does that mean the first guy who hurt him is better than the better all round fighter.. Or something like that any way!
     
    JackSilver likes this.