Why doesnt Wlad hold the "Ring" belt at Heavy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PolishPummler, Sep 18, 2007.


  1. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    We know with him it's a love/hate thing with fans but he is clearly the man at Heavy.

    IMO the "Ring" wants the most popular fighters to hold there belts so they can sell more mags.There is without a doubt a anti non American Heavy weight Champ bias in the US.Could this be the reason?He is not as marketbale as some of the belt holders in the division.
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He hasn't fulfilled the rules they apply across the board to all champions. He needs to beat the #2 guy (while he is #2). Has nothing to do with American or non American. And the other belt holders aren't American either, so it's not an American marketability thing.
     
  3. sandwichsurgeon

    sandwichsurgeon Active Member Full Member

    1,031
    4
    Feb 23, 2007
    There is no Heavyweight champion of the world.

    Unfortunate but true.
     
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Yeah but it has alot to do with popularity though.
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He is more popular and better known than the other 3 champs as well.

    He hasn't fulfilled the rules....thats all.
     
  6. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Well in that case who is the #2 guy???
     
  7. joeboxer

    joeboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,079
    0
    Oct 30, 2005
    also now that ring magazine is owned by a boxing promotions company...the ratings are definitely called into question...if they weren't already.
     
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Right now Peter. But that may change once Peter fights Maskaev.

    The rules say when a title is vacant, #1 vs #2 is needed to fill the vacancy.

    #1 can fight #3 under special circumstances. But Wlad hasn't fought either since being ranked #1.
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Ring is just another ABC.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    No, cuz they don't strip titles nor do they have mandatories.

    He can't just be crowned champion, he hasn't earned it yet.
     
  11. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Of course his last name isnt Hopkins,Jones,Johnson.

    He has to work twice as hard.
     
  12. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    And you said it!

    No mandatories because it is a popularity contest.They want the BIGGEST NAME to hold there belt not the best fighters.

    And this is why guys like Tarver and Hopkins try and take the easy route!
     
  13. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Are you implying that he doesn't hold the RING belt because he is not American?
     
  14. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    No im implying that the Ring is just another ABC.
     
  15. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    When/if he unifies one more belt, i'll consider him champ. as of know, he is the undisputed #1 hw. i dont really think its possible to unify more than 2 at this point. too much politics, belt turnover, etc....

    or he could sign with golden boy :yep