Why don't heavyweight contenders fight each other?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dizzle, Jul 12, 2011.


  1. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    Heavyweight has had pretty decent crossroad scraps as of late
     
  2. slim

    slim Active Member Full Member

    728
    0
    Sep 23, 2006
    Could not have put it better myself. :good:good:good
     
  3. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    been saying this for years...its the real reason the heavyweight division isnt as exciting as the lower weights
     
  4. Escopeta

    Escopeta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    8
    Apr 12, 2010
    the fans and the broadcasters just have very little interest on those fights. so the fighters would make very little money. a possible loss means no Klit payday, a win doesn´t necessarily higher the payday etc.. with those who already got beat by a Klitschko its different but even fewer ppl want to see them fight eachother...
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,604
    21,935
    Sep 15, 2009
    Last year i'd agree but this year they are:

    Vitali v adamek
    Pov v chag
    Chambers v thompson
    Helenius v liakhovic

    All we need is one of dmitrenko, boystov and arreola to fight each other and pretty much every top ten contender is in a meaningful fight :)
     
  6. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    I agree, this year there are some really good fights between the top guys in the division!

    Wlad (1) v Haye (3)
    Vitali (2) v Adamek (4)
    Povetkin (5) v Chagaev (6)
    Chambers (7) v Thompson
     
  7. Escopeta

    Escopeta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    8
    Apr 12, 2010
    Klits are not actually contenders.. they pretty much fight the best possible opponents year after year..
     
  8. chico g

    chico g Let's watch some Sesame Street...lmao Full Member

    10,832
    12,203
    Oct 18, 2008
    Heavyweights are more like business men nowadays, fight the a string of bums. Then cash in with the Klitschko's for a easy payday. The times of the warrior like mentality is gone....
     
  9. Blake Rayne

    Blake Rayne Fat Cuban Aficianado Full Member

    5,373
    11
    Mar 26, 2011
    All this talk of cashing in and not trying against the Klits is bull****. Guy gets 1 million to fight a Klit. Guy beats a Klit and he can pretty much guarantee he'll get 10 million plus for his next fight no matter how he performs. Set himself up for life. What more incentive would a Business man need?
     
  10. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    Exactly.

    It's hard to get excited about a prospect when all he fights are bums and journeymen.

    The perception of the heavyweight division is that it sucks, but that is due to the fact we cannot judge how good any of these contenders really are because all we see from them is beating unknowns to getting their arses handed to them by the Klitschko's.
     
  11. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    There would be more interest if they actually fought each other though. Nobody is going to watch a prospect beat up some guy who's already lost 5 times. We want young contenders to face off against each other and see how they do and by doing this and winning they will gain a following and more money.

    Calzaghe was a non draw before he fought Lacy on national television. But he took a pay cut in that fight, and every fight after that was PPV and earned him big money. You have to take risks and sometimes a bad payday to earn bigger bucks further down the line.
     
  12. Flyin Ryan

    Flyin Ryan Active Member Full Member

    1,289
    0
    Apr 17, 2006
    The current Ring top 10's fights against one another:

    Champ W. Klitschko (3-0): def. #4 Haye, def. #5 Chagaev, def. #6 Chambers
    1. V. Klitschko (1-0): def. #10 Arreola, vs. #2 Adamek later this year
    2. Adamek (1-0): def. #10 Arreola, vs. #1 V. Klitschko later this year
    3. Povetkin (1-0): def. #6 Chambers, vs. #5 Chagaev next month
    4. Haye (0-1): lost Champ W. Klitschko
    5. Chagaev (0-1): lost Champ W. Klitschko, vs. #3 Povetkin next month
    6. Chambers (1-2): lost #3 Povetkin, def. #7 Dimitrenko, lost Champ W. Klitschko
    7. Dimitrenko (0-1): lost #6 Chambers
    8. Boytsov (0-0)
    9. Helenius (0-0)
    10. Arreola (0-2): lost #1 V. Klitschko, lost #2 Adamek

    Helenius can be forgiven as he's new (and just beat Sam Peter). 7 total fights between these 11 men. All Klitschko fights were title fights. Chagaev-Povetkin is a title fight. Povetkin-Chambers was an IBF eliminator. Removing those out of the equations your only fights that weren't for a title or an eliminator (in other words, voluntary) were Adamek-Arreola and Chambers-Dimitrenko.
     
  13. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    Because there is no real point to boxing when you know the Klitshcko's are just going to destroy you anyway.
     
  14. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    if you beat a klit you have to face him again for the same money you got in the first fight. if you beat him again you have to face his brother for the same money you got in the first fight.

    you're beating off losing to the klit the first time out & chasing a fight with david haye.
     
  15. arve lie

    arve lie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,790
    6
    Feb 15, 2010
    Cubans Perez and Ortiz. Brits Chisora,Fury, Towers and Price
    others: Povetkin,Boytsov,Pulev Helenius
    Think Chambers,Arreola and Johnson deserve new chance.
    Would be very interesting to see these guys fight each other
    like Chisora-Fury. Like this weekends Lara -Wiliams it doesnt have to be a belt on the line to get attention.