Why don't Manny and Nate get it on for the undisputed title?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fitzgeraldz, Jul 13, 2008.


Page 1 of 4
  1. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    Why not fellas ... forget the money ... because they both are going to get theirs but this is about lightweight supremacy ... all 4 belts being held by one man ... no disputed to as who's the champion ...
     
    fitzgeraldz, Jul 13, 2008
    fitzgeraldz, Jul 13, 2008
    #1
  2. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It would still be disputed, since Casamayor is still lineal...
     
    Brickhaus, Jul 13, 2008
    Brickhaus, Jul 13, 2008
    #2
  3. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    OK ... the winner fighting Casa ...
     
    fitzgeraldz, Jul 13, 2008
    fitzgeraldz, Jul 13, 2008
    #3
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac vs the winner of Campbell/Guzman is the fight that makes sense.

    either that or JMM/Casa winner vs Campbell/Guzman winner, and Pac vs Diaz/Katsidis winner

    and then the winners to face off in a 100% undisputed championship final


    right now Pac is set to fight Humberto Soto, not the most interesting matchup.
     
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    #4
  5. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    would you dispute it? i won't **** casa. the winner of pac-campbell is THE man
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #5
  6. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    227
    Sep 28, 2007
    Castillo was the man. Corrales KOed Castillo and then Casa beat Corrales. Now Casa is the man.
     
    gambleer, Jul 13, 2008
    gambleer, Jul 13, 2008
    #6
  7. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    227
    Sep 28, 2007
    Is Pac-Soto done deal ?
     
    gambleer, Jul 13, 2008
    gambleer, Jul 13, 2008
    #7
  8. Ared

    Ared Active Member Full Member

    915
    6
    Jul 30, 2004
    This is the fight I want to see. I think there's going to be some reshuffling going on. Campbell is going to cancel his Guzman tiff to fight Pacquiao and Guzzy and Valero will get it on.
     
    Ared, Jul 13, 2008
    Ared, Jul 13, 2008
    #8
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    that's old testament type bull****. a p4p number 1 fighter is not the Man in his division? when did that happen?
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #9
  10. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007

    Yeah its bull**** right? Casa "the man"....Cus he has the "Lineal" belt :lol:...I love Casa and I think all 3 of those guys should get it on before we see who is king, but if Pac/Nate got it on the winner of that fight would be held in the highest light.
     
    jecxbox, Jul 13, 2008
    jecxbox, Jul 13, 2008
    #10
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac is obviously not the man at lightweight even though he is p4p number 1
     
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    #11
  12. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    if he is not the best in his division, could he be the best of everything? hell no.
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #12
  13. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It happened not that long ago when Baldomir was champ in WW and Floyd was #1 P4P. They have nothing to do with each other. You can't lose the real title outside of the ring.
     
    Brickhaus, Jul 13, 2008
    Brickhaus, Jul 13, 2008
    #13
  14. Willy Bonka

    Willy Bonka Active Member Full Member

    556
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    :deal
     
    Willy Bonka, Jul 13, 2008
    Willy Bonka, Jul 13, 2008
    #14
  15. Larson

    Larson Paenkhay Full Member

    2,747
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Because Nate Campbell isn't Mexican.
     
    Larson, Jul 13, 2008
    Larson, Jul 13, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 4