Why don't some classic boxing fans and historians give modern fighters credit?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Apr 3, 2017.


Why don't some classic boxing fans and historians give modern fighters credit?

Poll closed Dec 28, 2019.
  1. They don't like to give credit to boxers who are not from the USA or UK.

    6 vote(s)
    10.9%
  2. They do not watch modern fighters often enough and prefer to talk about old timers with fewer films.

    9 vote(s)
    16.4%
  3. They suffer from the thinking that my generation is better than yours

    28 vote(s)
    50.9%
  4. Boxing politics and rule changes

    7 vote(s)
    12.7%
  5. Other, state your reason.

    24 vote(s)
    43.6%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    So do you think Wlad and Joshua would simply overpower the likes of Ali, Tyson and Holyfield too ?
     
  2. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,143
    Sep 5, 2016
    No. Like I said there are all sorts of factors to consider. Wlad would be favoured IMO against both Ali and Holyfield due to the physical and stylistic advantages he possessed, but potentially prey to a prime Tyson. Joshua is relatively unproven so I wouldn't like to favour him against anyone at this stage, but his speed and power coupled with an innate sense of timing and distance would make him a tough task against anyone.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well then, it's just an opinion about Joe Louis's style. Fair enough.
    He's comparable in size and power to those guys, so it just comes down to guessing how styles match up.
     
  4. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,143
    Sep 5, 2016
    Louis would be considered a blown up cruiserweight nowadays, as dismissive as that term is. His best weight was a shade above 200, and modern day CWs regularly weigh in fight night in the 210s/215s.

    I don't see anything on film that suggests he was comparable in power to any modern top punching heavyweight so that has to be considered in any H2H matchup for me.

    Don't forget the advent of PEDs, which weren't around in Louis's day.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2017
    Pat M likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    So if GGG loses by stoppage to Canelo and loses a rematch to Jacobs his current status won't change?

    Now that is mind boggling to me!lol
    Joshua is a work in progress at the moment anyone making a definitive statement regarding his all time standing is a fool.Anyone saying he defeats 95% of past heavyweights is-well ,I wont go there.

    ATM I'd pick;
    Lewis
    Liston
    Ali
    Bowe
    Foreman
    Dempsey
    Louis
    Holyfield
    Tyson
    Frazier
    W Klit
    V Klit
    Johnson
    Walcott
    To beat him that's just off the top of my head.
    We don't even know if he can beat Wilder,Ortiz ,Pulev, or Parker!
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    If career completion doesn't matter, than perhaps Tyson Fury has the perfect formula.
     
  7. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    Well than thats the differance between me and you i can decipher actual abilities and what would actually happen say throwing a Joe Louis against a 6'6 ELITE 240 plus pounder like Joshua...do you really need a breakdown to show you why he defeats 95% of fighters to lace them up? Its illogical to suggest fighters of Louis wins against him. And i wont go there if you think he does........................................................... :eatingburger

    The rest you posted really has nothing to do with assessing someones career,obviously i already went over what you are asking.
     
  8. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    Fury has done nothing but defeat a not so motivated Klitchko....fury stll poses trouble for many guys,his 85 inch reach and 6'9 height just doesnt disappear bc of his resume.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    What I'm saying is we don't analyze fighters by the results of the entire span of their careers, than Fury has a good thing going on. Because he retired at the top, and never exposed himself to too many situations that would give away some vulnerabilities or weaknesses.

    Maybe he (for some randomly odd reason) sucks against swarmers. If he doesn't fight one, we'll never know. If he did, and got beat bad, it matters in assessing him against his peers.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  10. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    Have to disagree on Fury retiring bc he is an entire asterix on him bc he has Ped accusations and one meaninful win outside Chisora. He would be far better off losing to a top guy than being one of the worst HW champs in history and didnt even defend it once which also questions where he actually rates career wise?

    If he comes back and immediatley faces Joshua and loses it doesnt exactly mean anything in my book bc thats a huge task to take against someone i think will crush him.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    That's pretty much what we mean.
     
  12. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    I do believe the sport peaked in decades past when it was considerably more popular and had more fighters. However, I believe a great fighter is a great fighter in any era. And the true measure of any fighter is his success among his peers.
     
    It's Ovah likes this.
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.lol
    Your opinion is not only at odds with mine it is diametrically opposed to that held by the majority of boxing experts. No I don't need a breakdown from you thanks, I'm not that impressed with what I've seen of your analytical abilities so far.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Rhyme.
    The jury is still out on Fury.
     
  15. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Louis was an elite ATG. Joshua has proven himself as nothing so far in his short career. To pick lowly Joshua to beat the most highly skill hwt ever to live is fan boy talk. Big time fan boy talk.