Why Eddie Hearn? Why? Why sign Carl Froch?

I love Barry and Eddie Hearn. They are sensational for British sport - true legends.

But why sign that overrated conman Carl Froch? I mean this. Carl Froch is the luckiest boxer in mondern day boxing:

He gets given WBC 168 mandatory status because Denis Inkin was not fit enough to fight him.

He then avoids fighting Calzaghe because Joe moved on to bigger things (at the time). But lets face it, Froch would have lost to Joe if they fought in 2008.

Froch then fights a nobody in Pascal - in his backyard - for the vacant title. He then proceeds to live off Pascal's one good win against the equally overrated Dawson.

Froch then gets whooped by Jermain Taylor for 11 rounds only to luck out in the dying seconds.

Froch then gets schooled by Dirrell - another boxer who had done **** all - but he gets some home cooking.

Kessler then beats Froch. Easily in my opinion.

This is the best bit. Froch beats Arthur Abraham for the vacant WBC title, and people are calling him an ATG. AA is the WORST fighter Froch has fought. AA is the only PRIME fighter Froch has fought in this recent run.

Now Froch is going to fight old man Johnson. A guy who is 42 - over EIGHT years older than Froch - and Froch is getting credit for this.

Some people on here think Froch is PPV worthy. Don't make me laugh. Nobody knows who Carl Froch is.

He is a two-time champion but has never taken the title from a reigning champion. What a joke!

Carl Froch is the biggest conman in British boxing. He is a fraud. I don't want him soiling Sky Sports with his one-dimensonial abilities.

 

This content is protected

Hearn knows what he's doing :deal