Why floyd did not fought cotto or margarito

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ippo2011, Mar 23, 2011.


  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    The risk was not worth the value to fight those guys.
     
  2. exumspate

    exumspate Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,471
    207
    May 6, 2010
    Yes...
     
  3. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    Fair enough.
     
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Void is a coward with feathers.
     
  5. ViktorVaughn

    ViktorVaughn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,924
    0
    Jul 18, 2008
    He took a risk when he fought Genaro Hernandez (no choice since Genaro was the champ), he took a risk when he fought Corrales. The fight vs Hatton was at 147 so it was a calculated risk. Zab Judah fought well but everyone knew the outcome of the fight before it even started. I agree on the De La Hoya fight: it was a risk indeed because it was at 154 against a very motivated De La Hoya. Mosley made his knee buckled but that was the highlight of the night for Mosley which confirmed the fact that it was not a real challenge, even on paper.
     
  6. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Bob Arum got in the way, otherwise he would've beat the living **** out of Cotto at 140.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
  8. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    10,275
    5,941
    Sep 5, 2008
    Cause' it was too risky. He probably (imo, almost certainly) would have thumped them both soundly, but why take even a small risk when he can make big bucks pummeling shopworn, 2nd tier fighters? Floyd has more pride in his wealth than in his craft.