Why Floyd Had a 35% Connect

didn't need it for the sucker punch that ended the game. :deal

 

MAN **** COMPUBOX.

Who gives a **** about this ****?

 

Hey, PERFECTLY LEGAL..WHOOPS, ORTIZ'S FAULT...PROBABLY SHOULDN'T START SOMETHING HE CAN'T HANDLE..

FIGHTIN "DIRTY" GOT HIS A$$ KNOCKED THE FUK OUT

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Why should a boxing fan not make a break down of his favourit boxer?

Lazarus, you are a fail atsch

 

It has to do with interest in the sport.

Since you dont have it yourself, you cant possibly grasp it :-(

 

Generally speaking, 35% is good accuracy for the more active/aggressive fighter (and Floyd was unusually active that night...well, he usually is against southpaws). Once it goes up to the 40's, it's usually a one-sided beat-down. Good point with the jab, kinda like Pac... primarily used as a range-finder, or bait-to-counter but tends to bring accuracy numbers down.

 

If you lack interest in how Floyd uses his jab to set up his right just switch on the TV and watch some baseball, man.

 

I tried to explain to *****s that Pac landed 58% of his powershots on Margo and 18% of his jabs because he was using the jab to measure him but they couldn't understand it.

58% :deal

against Mosley, Pac landed 50% of his powershots, 13% of his jabs. *****s couldn't understand why. they think he doesn't have a good jab

 

Would love that too, trouble is...I'm not sure Floyd would be completely honest about the parts of fights where he doesn't do everything right. Still worth it to hear his take on what he does do best though.

 

Well at least TS is starting to get an idea.

 

*****s generally don't know **** about boxing, they only follow floyd.