Why Floyd is not the best fighter P4P?

I agree. A guy fighting continual useless opponents like Guerrero, Ortiz and Maidana in between degraded versions of Cotto and Canelo can't be the best while simultaneously ducking the real threats.

Does he belong on the list? Yes.

Top 5? Sure.

Number 1? That ought to go to the guy who's dominating the actual best in his weight range. That would have been Ward for a minute, but he's been inactive.

Right now I'd have it vacant personally and the 2-10 be a mix of Pac, Floyd, Rigo, Ward and the rest.

Just def no Wlad Klitschko. Insulting to my intelligence people rank that overrated fighter up there with actual P4P talent.

 

lol..mayweather can never win against you haters

 

Who's this Mayweather guy I haven't seen his name before. Please tell me more. < LOL I'M A POET AND I DIDN'T REALISE.

 

Yawn

 

His resume is better than everyone else's. His performances, particularly impressive when given the previous statement, are better than everyone else's. He is tied for the record of most divisions holding lineal titles in his career. He is the first fighter in almost a century to hold lineal titles in two separate divisions simultaneously and still holds that distinction actively and is attempting to be the first simultaneous double lineal and unified champ. He has fought top 5 ranked fighters in the division he fought them in dating all the way back to Marquez in '09, who was #2 on the P4P list himself.

If he is not P4P #1 on your personal list, then please direct yourself to the "Log Out" in the top right of your computer screen and slap yourself.

 

seriously, I've always thought you were one of the best posters on this forum. but lately you've taken a dive...maybe you need time away? I don't know

but the post above isn't what I would come to expect from you

belts are candy in boxing. accrediting them is what I expect biased people like bailey to do because anyone who has won one (and there are many) can always be seen in a good light when you embrace their relevance to the sport...which for the most part should be throwing them in the trash

you're a good poster on here, but don't let over-activity turn you into something else

 

Wrong. Calzaghe held the lineal Super Middleweight title and lineal Light Heavyweight title after beating Bernard Hopkins.

 

OO, ouch :hey That must have hurt :deal

 

The way he ducked Berto was disgusting

He put shxt on Guerrero's gloves so Berto would have an allergic reaction

 

Please explain to me how Pacquiao has fought better opposition!

Here's a prime example of how you guys hate but hold Floyd to a higher standard: Mayweather fights Mosely after his big victories, he's considered old and washed up. Pacquiao fights Mosely after a loss and a draw, but it's a great victory for Pacquiao. So how is Mosely a bad fight for Floyd but a good fight for Pacquiao? Because you hold Floyd to a higher standard and he's expected to fight better opposition than Pacquiao, that's why. You guys keep hating while simultaneously putting him on a pedestal.

 

Please tell me how Pacquiao has won more division titles yet has less title defenses. Name a welterweight that has a better resume than Floyd right now.

 

Even the guys people think should P4P #1 instead of Floyd, think Floyd is the best in the world. I think that says more than anything, that he is in his rightful spot at #1.

 

Cal beat Hop, lmao...!!!??? Hop outboxed Cal, put him on his ass, and got screwed out of a decision.