Why Froch vs Calzaghe should have happened- a lesson for other boxers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013.


Page 2 of 3
  1. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
    The whole point of the thread though was about beating good, ranked prospects with the idea that in the future they will go on to achieve a lot and be a good name on the resume. Froch has not ventured up to 175 up to this day but he might have done for Joe.
     
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    #16
  2. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    Sorry but its not as simple as that, more like a double edged sword. What if Joe had Lacy'd an unexperienced Froch to the point he never fully recovers his confidence. Surely a loss would have meant he misses out on the super6 and never builds his considerable resume.
     
    DOM5153, Jan 26, 2013
    DOM5153, Jan 26, 2013
    #17
  3. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
    Calzaghe had achieved just about everything he could in boxing. He did not need to fight Froch. However, Joe stated that he felt Froch was calling him out just to build publicity but in reality, Froch would have been a very good name on Joe's resume. I am sure most boxing fans would rate Calzaghe higher if he had a win against Froch on his resume.
     
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    #18
  4. ELECTRIC GURU

    ELECTRIC GURU Active Member Full Member

    1,228
    6
    Sep 6, 2012

    Calzaghe had just took out the 2 best undefeated prospects in the division in Lacy and Kessler, I understand your train of thought but after he postponed retirement and took out Froch, there would be someone else come along as well to offer a challenge.

    I think if most people are honest, they are extremely surprised at what Froch has gone on to achieve considering his limited ability. Hindsights a wonderfull thing and Calzaghe might have ruined a green Froch anyway.
     
    ELECTRIC GURU, Jan 26, 2013
    ELECTRIC GURU, Jan 26, 2013
    #19
  5. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
    I think Froch has shown that he has the mental strength to bounce straight back from defeat.
     
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    #20
  6. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
    Maybe a domestic clash with Froch instead of Manfredo?
     
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    seansanashee, Jan 26, 2013
    #21
  7. MAJR

    MAJR Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,537
    412
    Jul 16, 2012
    The only time I see a fight between Calzaghe and Froch as even a possibility is if Calzaghe fought him early 2007 instead of Manfredo. Calzaghe was loosing his passion for boxing and was determined to retire after 2008, so Froch's window of opportunity is fleeting. Question is, was Froch a more suitable opponent at the time than Manfredo was?
     
    MAJR, Jan 26, 2013
    MAJR, Jan 26, 2013
    #22
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,404
    26,946
    Jul 21, 2012
    Froch was mandatory to Clalzaghe's WBC belt. He was in the same position Kell Brook is in now and well known in British boxing from blowing Damon Hauge out in 1 round years earlier for the British title.

    Froch being a nobody at the time was bull****. Hennessy offered fisheyes millions to fight Froch. Joe would be a lot better today legacy wise if he took the fight but a win wasn't a guarantee and he could well of lost.
     
    dinovelvet, Jan 26, 2013
    dinovelvet, Jan 26, 2013
    #23
  9. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Carl Froch said in a interview on Setanta that he would not go up to 175.
     
    The Genius, Jan 26, 2013
    The Genius, Jan 26, 2013
    #24
  10. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Froch became mandatory for the WBC belt after Joe fought Hopkins. Joe was done at 168.

    Kessler was a fight Joe could have lost. Hopkins was a fight Joe could have lost. Do you think HBO would have accepted Froch as an opponent?
     
    The Genius, Jan 26, 2013
    The Genius, Jan 26, 2013
    #25
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,404
    26,946
    Jul 21, 2012
    ^Wrong. Joe vacated and moved up to LH and Froch fought Pascal for the vacant belt.

    HBO didn't want Roy, they wanted Joe to fight Pavlik.
     
    dinovelvet, Jan 26, 2013
    dinovelvet, Jan 26, 2013
    #26
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Calzaghe thought Manfredo is a far more deserving option and Calzaghe is an all-time great at picking bums.
     
    Scar, Jan 26, 2013
    Scar, Jan 26, 2013
    #27
  13. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    Calzaghe would have beaten him prime for prime so I'm not really bothered
     
    Vidic, Jan 26, 2013
    Vidic, Jan 26, 2013
    #28
  14. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    no way Froch could ko Calzaghe
     
    |A|C|S|, Jan 26, 2013
    |A|C|S|, Jan 26, 2013
    #29
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Foreman would have beaten Ali too, remember? Why did they bother?
     
    Scar, Jan 26, 2013
    Scar, Jan 26, 2013
    #30
Page 2 of 3