Why Golovkin avoids Lara, and even pretends he doesn't exist

Another fine example of you not knowing anything.

 

Why do you keep putting an emphasis on 154 Lara ?

GGG is fighting 147 Kell Brook.

Lara is a joke , but 147 Brook is acceptable? Are you a Grade A moron or something?

 

atsch

 

This reasoning makes the Brook fight even more embarrassing than it already is. Are you too dumb to think that far ahead?

 

What are you talking about?


Matchroom work in conjunction with Sky, HBO and K2.

A date is given/agreed upon.

Matchroom book the stadium.

Work then begins on putting a complete card together, with the contracts being drawn up etc.


Stop hating.

Don't turn into Shock.

It's really not cool.

 

Right?!? :rofl Doesn't know any details and just talks $hit...

 

the lara that stopped angulo...the angulo that stopped joachime alcine in 1 round...the alcine that beat david lemieux....ya...that guy!

 

The same Lara that gave a prime Angulo a career ending beating , yeah.

Lara will go to town on the defensively lacking Golovkin. Angulo's high guard is what saved him from an earlier stoppage.

Golovkin has no guard at all.

They want no part of him for a reason.

 

Do you think this is supposed to mean something? Everyone with an ounce of intelligence knows this triangle doesn't mean squat. Well, everyone but a noob like you that is. :good

 

You are right...Angulo has MUCH better defense that 3G. :rofl

 

do you think saying "ggg knocks lara out easily in 3" coming from a bunch of groupie fgt fans on a message board means anything?

everyone with an ounce of intelligence knows lara would be the best opponent gee has ever had....

lol....people like you are the worst type of "boxing" fan....havent you been embarrassed enough after pac embarrassed himself and all his fans?

 

WTF does this have to do with that you quoted from me? :rofl

Everyone knows the triangle theory is bull$hit in boxing, as I said. And you reply with nonesense? Was that to hide the fact that you didn't know that about the triangle theory? :deal

 

I never said that. Understand the styles that make fights before you open your trap.

 

go through and read the board...stop ignoring the fact that your boy "Jimmy" has used the triangle theory today to his advantage

like i said....people keeping using the excuse "ggg knocks lara out easily" ...as if its proof.....why bother fighting anyone? ggg apparently knocks everyone out...he should just retire then....no point in proving anything

lara would be best opponent hes ever faced....yet he never calls lara....but somehow has time to make ibf defenses against injury replacements...lol

you and his groupies are the worst kind of toxic sludge in boxing fandom

yer that same loser LanceUppercut from alaska that went on for years about how great pac was and how hed beat floyd......the tears of shame that must have rolled down your face...now yer on to your newest hero/crush....so sad

 

Actually...you did in a way. :good All good bro!