To be honest this is the first fight Quigg will have some sort of a test against Agbeko if the fight goes ahead. I know he has only boxed Rigondeaux in Super Bamtamweight division but this is Quiggs hardest test even if Agbeko has lost 4 of his last 6 fights. How can Quigg compete with a fighter who is a gate keeper to the big World title fights for the real belts and a former World Champion who knows every trick in the book. I think Eddie and Joe might of ****ed up making this fight for Quigg.
clev bellew ain't, and frampton is the reason it'd be ppv v quigg. same question, if galahad is such a walkover for quigg, with better money and coverage than he's had before, why turn down the fight?
The same Carl Frampton who Sky didn't care about losing as he did horrendous numbers? That Frampton? One minute the viewer numbers are important with you, the next second they're not. Make your mind up.
for a broadcaster who weren't bothered about frampton leaving, they don't half seem keen to get him back on. i have no idea how you work out your 2nd point. how's about you answer my question to you, our sol? other than ratings, how do you measure the success of a tv event? i'm all eyes.
Revenue made. Are you trying to tell me that Galahad fights on Channel 5 getting more viewers than Froch - Groves makes it a bigger fight? Behave.
He's not a world champion you fool. There are 4 recognized championship belts, Quigg doesn't hold one of them. The only person with an agenda is you trying to sell Quiggs paper title as legit. It's about as legit as a fringe belts like the IBO or WBF titles. Just paper titles to draw in the casuals. The WBA champ is Rigondeaux. You know this as well.
You can't be that stupid? It's a world title whether you like it or not. I love how you can argue that he isn't a world champion as that would mean there are two in one organisation, yet can tell me with a straight face that there are 4 legitimate world champions because each holds a belt in a separate organisation; as though that is any better. Hopefully you can see the oxymoron in that. Can just imagine the conversation between them all: 1) "I'm world champion!" 2) "No, I'm world champion" 3) "Hang on, I've got a world championship belt" 4) "**** off you three, I'm world champion" You buy into the propaganda more than I if you can tell everyone Carl is a true world champion when the reality is he is ducking the best man in the division. If Carl's a world champ, so is Quigg.
Mate you really are trolling bad. There have been four recognized belts for 2 decades. That's not changing any time soon. Interim belts and Regular belts are not championship belts, it has nothing to do with being the #1 in the division- you're a champion if you hold one of the top belts of the 4 main sanctioning bodies, Quigg doesn't. If only the recognized #1 in the division is the champion, then Britain hasn't had a single champion since Ricky Hatton There's loads of fringe belts that are sold off as world titles, Quigg holds one of these. Frampton holds a recognized title. You, Sky, Quigg and Hearn, that's the people who buy into Quiggs 'World Title' belt. Them as a marketing tool and you because you're trolling.
finally, an answer! quigg ain't ppv, leaving advertising revenue. due to higher viewing figures, 5 can charge more than sky. so we've ascertained galahad brought higher viewing figures, revenue, crowds and pay to the table. why did quigg forsake all this when it's an easy win?
Which is why Tyson is now fighting on Boxnation? :huh No, we've ascertained you've made everything up with absolutely no factual evidence to back up what you are saying.
fury and chisora bring more than quigg. i also like how the company you constantly predict the bankruptcy of outbid 5. you need to make your mind up. where you invent i calculate. we've also ascertained you won't answer a straight question.