This has got nothing to do with my OP. Please respond to the facts presented. However, in life and in careers, people achieve things at different ages. For instance, Amir Khan turned pro at 18, Calzaghe turned pro aged 21. Calzaghe won his first title aged 25, Khan at 22. You cannot deny that Khan's Olympic success lead to immediate exposure. Also, the internet has made the world a smaller place. Young prospects are being watched and discussed by fans around the world. Fans can even interact with fighters today.This was not possible to the same extent 10 years ago - even five years ago. More Importantly: some fighters have success and recognition early on and then finish badly. Other fighters start their careers poorly but finish with great success. Joe Calzaghe finished his career more successfully than both Hatton and Hamed.
simple.... because he didn't have a decent win until his 3rd last fight and only ever beat 2 great fighters, one of which (Jones) doesn't do anything for his legacy cause he was shot to **** and the other (B-Hops) was past his prime but still good so Joe gets credit for that one, only problem is half the boxing world had Hopkins winning and Joe retired without giving a rematch. So the guy was a champ for 11 straight years and managed to not fight a decent opponent until his 3rd last fight.....clearly a ducker....not his fault though, it was obviously Franky W but still kills his legacy
No half the boxing world didnt have Hopkins winning atsch. Try and rewrite history, but remember at the time many wanted Hopkins to retire after Calzaghe beat him and due to the way Calzaghe beat him many felt Pavlik would win. That was because Calzaghe made him look so poor. Beat - Hopkins, sandwiched between Hopkins best wins of Tarver, Wright and Pavlik, in America, at a new weight with 3 American judges and Cortez as ref, and scored the single highest score card against Hopkins ever 116-111, with 2 judges agreeing on 9 of the rounds, landing more on Hopkins than anyone ever. Calzaghe won because he was able to land his left more often than Hopkins could land his right. Calzaghe finished the stronger and took away the moments Hopkins likes down the stretch, something nobody else has been able to do. J Taylor was being beaten towards the end as was Pascal. Hopkins was the #1 LHW and became again after Calzaghe retired. Jones - who many felt would beat him Kessler - who became the top SMW when Calzaghe left the division Lacy - who many felt would beat him Mitchell - Arguably Americas best SMW of the decade Reid - who won the WBC title and was unlucky not to win the IBF & WBA titles Eubank Woodhall Brewer Starie Manfredo Sheika Mkertchyan Veit Bika This content is protected
Eubank fought ten years undefeated until he met one Steve Collins in Dublin and some dare to say this stiff cyborg would have succeded with Hopkins at MW. The only thing Eubank had was muscular strength such as Antwon Echols or Robert Allen so I suggest you to go see how Hopkins outmanouevred them. This calzaghe thang is going too far for my liking.
these superfights usually happen when the lower weight fighter makes the step up in weight to fight the higher weight fighter. did hopkins go down in weight to fight de la hoya or trinidad? you have to bare in mind that 16 of hopkins first 22 fights were above the middlweight limit of 160, hopkins would have been clearly comfortable fighting calzaghe at 168. after calzaghe record pay day offer to fight hopkins, hopkins fought 3 times against nobodys (making less for 3 fights than he would have done for one fight with calzaghe) before he met de la hoya. surely hopkins could have adjusted back to 160 easily by the time the de la hoya fight came around over 2 years later, especially as he was recieving a record pay offer. the fight between hopkins and calzaghe was gonna take place in america, not wales This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Inbreeding has really damaged you hasn't it. You just listed 4 separate countries as the same. Still I can see how this would confuse a person whose mum is also their sister!
No, it is not Sir. Chris had that flamboyant entrances and star appeal yes, even I went to watch him live. Chris was supremely fit, muscular, disciplined and fearless. Chris came from the US as an amateur and had huge wins in memorable wars, comes up to my mind the win against Benn for the WBO MW Title and that fateful turn of events in that windy night for the vacant WBO SMW Title, the rematch with Watson when he was being outworked all the way and getting back up from a knockdown at the end of the 11th stanza, he pulled a monster uppercut that had Watson virtually out even for the beggining of the 12th... However, you watch Eubank perform and what can you make out of it - stiff, straight up, couldn't move his body cause he was so massive muscular ( had to make use of his legs, block shots or feint with his head), couldn't throw combinations b'cause his arms were so heavy ( hands on his waist and knockdown in the first by Joe), just jabs, one-twos with inaccurate right handers, right hand always weightin so much it would come down as he threw that shot, hooks inside... Let's face it, a monster of a physical specimen, nothing to do with a loose, adjustable and adaptable boxer... It work out for him even tho he lost to Watson the first time and to Benn in the rematch in Old Trafford and in my view until Collins showed him that you can not box standing still and just punch in spurts. Now, and I am sorry, look at Robert Allen with his power and specially Antwon Echols with almost all his wins coming by kayo... They had Hopkins backing up and eating a lot of heavy shots before fading down later on. Hopkins would have done the same to Eubanks. Toney would have taken the head out of Chris with one of his monster fast right hands like he almost did with former mandatory challenger Tim Littles and with a nasty cut that left for him 3 minutes to stop the fight or lose... Please watch it wherever you want these and tell me frankly what Eubank would have done against Toney? Comparing Littles or even Prince Charles Williams with Eubank doesn't make sense but putting Eubank in Littles or Prince Charles Williams place and seeing him go makes sense 4 me. Then, comparing Robert Allen and Antwon Echols and Chris Eubank like massive, powerful but stiff and mechanical fighters is not criminal at all, I am sorry.
In the middle age, people did not dare to say the name of the Devil. Which is why he is called "The Devil", by the way, since his authentic name is Lusipher. This is the same phenomena. ESB-moderaters have taken precautions.