Why is Calzaghe undefeated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by margo82, Nov 9, 2008.


Page 1 of 3
  1. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    906
    0
    Sep 24, 2008
    Well...
     
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    #1
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Cuz he never lost a fight
     
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    #2
  3. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    906
    0
    Sep 24, 2008
    There's a poll now, so now use one of the options given to you, *****.
     
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    #3
  4. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Some of both. But in his prime, he wasnt tested against other prime fighters ala Jones & Hopkins
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    #4
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,302
    11,344
    Jan 6, 2007
    :rofl :rofl:rofl :rofl :rofl


    :good
     
    cuchulain, Nov 9, 2008
    cuchulain, Nov 9, 2008
    #5
  6. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    good poll, we shall see....
     
    H ., Nov 9, 2008
    H ., Nov 9, 2008
    #6
  7. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
    edit
     
    Bodysnatcher, Nov 9, 2008
    Bodysnatcher, Nov 9, 2008
    #7
  8. cdvandy

    cdvandy I'm Not Afraid Full Member

    632
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Because he hasn't fought Dawson yet
     
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    #8
  9. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Neither?
     
    heidegger, Nov 9, 2008
    heidegger, Nov 9, 2008
    #9
  10. rickx1

    rickx1 Legend Full Member

    3,183
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    Dawson is ****.
     
    rickx1, Nov 9, 2008
    rickx1, Nov 9, 2008
    #10
  11. tylerrcurtis

    tylerrcurtis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    2
    Aug 15, 2008
    both i would say
     
    tylerrcurtis, Nov 9, 2008
    tylerrcurtis, Nov 9, 2008
    #11
  12. scott is cool

    scott is cool Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    Because he is a brilliant fighter. If people say he hasn't fought any good fighters then why did everybody think Lacy was "the next big thing" and he got literallt DESTRYED by Joe? Also Hopkins is a great fighter. If people suggest he was 42 during their fight well he beat Pavlik who was supposed to be better than Calzaghe, so if anybody claims that they're ignorant, stupid ****s.
    And all the people who (before Pavlik LOST:yep) said Pavlik was better and tha Calzaghe had never fought anybody good lets compare resume's:

    Calzaghe notable wins:
    Eubank
    Reid
    Lacy
    Kessler
    Hopkins
    Jones

    Pavlik notable wins:
    Taylor
    And **** all

    HAHAHAHA! Whoever thought Pavlik was better while claiming Calzaghe had never fought anybody good is a stupid ****.
     
    scott is cool, Nov 9, 2008
    scott is cool, Nov 9, 2008
    #12
  13. cdvandy

    cdvandy I'm Not Afraid Full Member

    632
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    He's better than the 40 yr olds Calzaghe has been fighting
     
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    #13
  14. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    I'd favor him over both
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    #14
  15. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Bth to some degree
     
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 3