Why is Calzaghe undefeated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by margo82, Nov 9, 2008.

Page 1 of 3
  1. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well...
     
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    #1
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    38,466
    Likes Received:
    21
    Cuz he never lost a fight
     
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    #2
  3. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's a poll now, so now use one of the options given to you, *****.
     
    margo82, Nov 9, 2008
    #3
  4. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Some of both. But in his prime, he wasnt tested against other prime fighters ala Jones & Hopkins
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    #4
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    38,431
    Likes Received:
    13,281
    :rofl :rofl:rofl :rofl :rofl


    :good
     
    cuchulain, Nov 9, 2008
    #5
  6. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    12,826
    Likes Received:
    3
    good poll, we shall see....
     
    H ., Nov 9, 2008
    #6
  7. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    edit
     
    Bodysnatcher, Nov 9, 2008
    #7
  8. cdvandy

    cdvandy I'm Not Afraid Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because he hasn't fought Dawson yet
     
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    #8
  9. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Neither?
     
    heidegger, Nov 9, 2008
    #9
  10. rickx1

    rickx1 Legend Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dawson is ****.
     
    rickx1, Nov 9, 2008
    #10
  11. tylerrcurtis

    tylerrcurtis Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,533
    Likes Received:
    2
    both i would say
     
    tylerrcurtis, Nov 9, 2008
    #11
  12. scott is cool

    scott is cool Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because he is a brilliant fighter. If people say he hasn't fought any good fighters then why did everybody think Lacy was "the next big thing" and he got literallt DESTRYED by Joe? Also Hopkins is a great fighter. If people suggest he was 42 during their fight well he beat Pavlik who was supposed to be better than Calzaghe, so if anybody claims that they're ignorant, stupid ****s.
    And all the people who (before Pavlik LOST:yep) said Pavlik was better and tha Calzaghe had never fought anybody good lets compare resume's:

    Calzaghe notable wins:
    Eubank
    Reid
    Lacy
    Kessler
    Hopkins
    Jones

    Pavlik notable wins:
    Taylor
    And **** all

    HAHAHAHA! Whoever thought Pavlik was better while claiming Calzaghe had never fought anybody good is a stupid ****.
     
    scott is cool, Nov 9, 2008
    #12
  13. cdvandy

    cdvandy I'm Not Afraid Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's better than the 40 yr olds Calzaghe has been fighting
     
    cdvandy, Nov 9, 2008
    #13
  14. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    I'd favor him over both
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 9, 2008
    #14
  15. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    38,466
    Likes Received:
    21
    Bth to some degree
     
    catasyou, Nov 9, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 3