Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Sep 14, 2007.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    You sure it wasn't close?, I really remember checking one of the sites on fight night( a few hours before the card starts) and it was really close. Might be wrong again, my memory totally sucks lately.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    :lol: :lol:
     
  3. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Shows what you know.:D
     
  4. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Shut up..prime Bhop JT and Roy beat calzaghe no matter how much you dont like it. Calzaghe would never be mentioned in the same breath as those guys....EVER...
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Ahem...

    Shows what you know.:D
     
  6. box03

    box03 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Aug 19, 2007
    Yeah it was about time Calzaghe fought a good american fighter, its probably the most prize money he ever got for a fight. Calzaghe fought a great fight that night that made me take notice of him.
     
  7. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    He could be if he beats Mikkel Kessler, Lucian Bute, Bernard Hopkins, the winner of Jermain Taylor/Kelly Pavlik, and Chad Dawson. That would make him a 2 division world champion (and actually the champion). Plus, if he did that, he would retire 48-0 with potentially 24 title defenses.

    Joe probably needs to beat Kessler, Hopkins, Dawson, and the winner of Taylor/Pavlik to secure his place right up there with those 3.
     
  8. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Hopkins is too old, that would be worthlles.

    Beating Kessler, the Taylor/Pavlik winner and Dawson ends all questions, especially if they DOMINATIVE victories. How a fight is won counts for a lot.

    For example, dominating Kessler and Dawson ought to be considered way better than a come from behind KO over Nunn, which is one of Toney's biggest wins.

    Plus, losing to Taylor is pretty sour in my opinion, but again, he's old, Calzaghe would stop him at this point and would recieve no credit.
     
  9. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Yes, about time he got the oppurtunity, time for circle jerkers to stop ducking. Too bad it had to be against a guy who was overrated, but it sent a reality check to the boxing media.
     
  10. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Calzaghe would NEVER EVER EVER be able to stop BHop a fighter that has fought the better fighter in ROY JONES JR in his prime and was not close to being stopped EVER....GET a clue you dillusional twat.:nut:nut:nut:nut:nut:nut
     
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I think a win over Bernard Hopkins would mean a lot for Calzaghe. Hopkins is the 4th best P4P fighter in Ring Magazine and is the Ring 175 pound champion. Plus a HOFer coming off of two excellent wins wouldn't be a bad thing for Joe's resume. In my opinion, when people look back on him and if they saw Calzaghe UD12 Hopkins (Joe wouldn't stop him), he would get more respect.
     
  12. box03

    box03 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Aug 19, 2007
    He probably wishes he would of came to the states years ago, then again the middlewieght division was filled with alot of great fighters that could of gave him a tough fight like Jones, Hopkins, or Toney.
     
  13. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Allow me to explain myself.

    Hopkins is 42 years old, he is crafty and can hide this by fighting the right guys, but he is not even 50% of his peak ability and has to fight very paced. Against Calzaghe, he'd be dead exhausted after four rounds considering the pace and it'd just get worse from there.

    He is 42 years old, it is absurd for him to be considered a top 5 P4P fighter at this point, especially with the losses to Taylor on paper. Taylor had him ultra conservative/paced, as did Wright, only Wright couldn't impose himself as a smaller man.

    Now, what does Calzaghe do? He fights at a frantic pace non-stop, this is poison for Hopkins and Hopkins gets thrashed, he's a 42 year old fighter.
     
  14. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Calzaghe would outwork Hopkins at this stage and win a decision, but Hopkins ring generalship, counter punching, and defense would prevent Calzaghe from getting off at quite the same frantic pace. Hopkins, despite being 42 is still an elite fighter who has the stamina, toughness, and defense to last the distance against anybody from 160-175.
     
  15. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    because the majority of people only heard of him or respected him after he blitzed lacy,people who've followed joe for years like i have know hes faced some good tough opponents.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.