Why is Carl Froch in the top 10 p4p?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Feb 2, 2014.


Page 5 of 10
  1. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008

    :rofl
     
    Two Shakes, Feb 3, 2014
    Two Shakes, Feb 3, 2014
    #61
  2. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    He isn't even Britain's best P4P.
     
    jc, Feb 3, 2014
    jc, Feb 3, 2014
    #62
  3. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    People think resume is the only thing that matters p4p in this thread.

    LOL
     
    Slyk, Feb 3, 2014
    Slyk, Feb 3, 2014
    #63
  4. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    I disagree. His resume isn't far off and then add to that the fact that he's undefeated, has become the man in his division and just looks more skilled than Froch and I think he could easily be rated higher than Froch.
     
    Bub, Feb 3, 2014
    Bub, Feb 3, 2014
    #64
  5. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    I'm pointing out a double standard you absolute plank. I couldn't give a **** about either fighter to be totally honest.
     
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    #65
  6. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    So can we all agree that Darnell Boone should be on the p4p list? Just look at his resume! Kovalev x 2, Stevenson X 2, Ward, Lara, Rodriquez, Stevens, Pascal, etc.

    Granted he lost to all of them but it's not about winning or dominant performances, it's all about the resume.
     
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    #66
  7. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    "Boone's resume speaks for itself.

    If he were a loud mouth brit with low technical ability, I'd have him at #6 (have him tied for 9th with Mayorga right now)."

    -- Brittard
     
    Slyk, Feb 3, 2014
    Slyk, Feb 3, 2014
    #67
  8. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    :lol:
     
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    loughlan, Feb 3, 2014
    #68
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I do not believe in P4P................................Froch has been a tough fighter, but he is not skilled..............
     
    Farmboxer, Feb 3, 2014
    Farmboxer, Feb 3, 2014
    #69
  10. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    :blood
     
    Faerun, Feb 3, 2014
    Faerun, Feb 3, 2014
    #70
  11. Elvizzz

    Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,035
    550
    Jun 29, 2008
    No need to point out you are a ****... We know...
     
    Elvizzz, Feb 4, 2014
    Elvizzz, Feb 4, 2014
    #71
  12. persianprince

    persianprince Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    120
    Mar 29, 2011
    by far he is. Only haters say he isn't :bbb

    #FrochP4P #DealWithIt :deal
     
    persianprince, Feb 4, 2014
    persianprince, Feb 4, 2014
    #72
  13. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    After they put Broner in P4P top 10 you can find excuse for any fighter!
     
    FilipMNE, Feb 4, 2014
    FilipMNE, Feb 4, 2014
    #73
  14. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,519
    1,130
    Nov 5, 2011
    I think what's curious is your bias against British fighters? Have you had a traumatic incident with a Brit in the past slyk?
     
    LondonRingRules, Feb 4, 2014
    LondonRingRules, Feb 4, 2014
    #74
  15. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Don't get mad because I'm pointing out how stupid it is to include fighters in a p4p list based on resume alone. If you have a counter argument I'd like to hear it otherwise kindly stfu :good
     
    loughlan, Feb 4, 2014
    loughlan, Feb 4, 2014
    #75
Page 5 of 10