Why is Carl Froch retiring after 35 fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beatle, Jun 26, 2015.


  1. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    His career spans from his first fight in 2002 to his last fight in 2014. That's a 12-year career, and only 35 fights. He has never been knocked out or even seriously injured, so I'm puzzled as to why he would retire now, when he can make huge paydays.

    Just to compare:

    Joe Calzaghe had a 15-year career with 46 fights.

    Bernard Hopkins had a 26-year career with 64 fights.

    So is Carl Froch retiring just because he's rich and doesn't need the money? Surely he's thinking that the extra millions he can still make will be useful to his children. I doubt he's going to retire.
     
  2. markclow

    markclow Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    325
    Aug 23, 2005
    Better to get out when you are wealthy and healthy. Smart.
     
  3. split_decision

    split_decision Electronic information tampers with your soul Full Member

    5,456
    1,244
    Apr 14, 2010
  4. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,715
    9,943
    Jan 27, 2014
    Maybe the fire isn't there anymore and, if that's the case, he is a wise man to leave now.
     
  5. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    :hey
     
  6. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    Why do people get on fighters for thinking about retiring when seeing cases like rjj, Holyfield and literally begging them to stop, froch u say has not been injured but despite his chin and heart he hasn't been the most defensively savvy fighter and taken a **** load of punches over the years , Kessler twice, pascal, taylor, groves 1 to name a few, taking 300 punches over 12 rounds will do a lot more damage than getting pole axed in 2 rds
     
  7. GolovKing

    GolovKing ESB Since 2006 Full Member

    2,235
    440
    Jul 18, 2013
    1. It's wise to leave the boxing game while you are on top.

    2. He's got his health and in boxing, that can change very quickly.

    3. What else does the guy have to prove? He is the third most dominant super middleweight of his generation. Not too bad.

    4. He's probably a multi millionaire and if he is smart, he's invested it wisely and spread his assets out among many areas.

    5. If your heart is not in this game, it's best to not step back in the ring.
     
  8. GolovKing

    GolovKing ESB Since 2006 Full Member

    2,235
    440
    Jul 18, 2013
    Great points.
     
  9. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    You would have a good point if there were some powerpuncher at SMW who could really hurt Froch. I don't think Ward and DeGale are serious threats to Carl's health. If anything, he is more of a threat to them.
     
  10. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    1. Froch is not on top. Ward and DeGale are.

    2. If he stays at SMW, he's safe because there are no powerpunchers there.

    3. You answered your own question: he's the third best SMW. If he beats DeGale, he becomes the very best, with an even better resume than Calzaghe's and Ward's.

    4. He's rich but he can become much richer with just one more fight.

    5. This is your only good point. If he can't get the motivation back, then all the other points are useless.
     
  11. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    Fighters don't show symptoms of wars sometime until years after they retire, it's his chin and lack of getting kod that could be the biggest problem for him, the guy has done enough to at least be some kind of foot note in British boxing history, I'm sure he's happy with that
     
  12. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    So weak, he can become richer? :patsch, maybe the guy would rather actually spend time with his family which boxers pretty much neglect with the amount of training they have to put in as a professional

    You obviously have no idea how cumulative damage can render a fighter to eventually go down to fighters who are not classed by the average joe as power punchers, groves is no power punch but he had froch all over the place

    I think the point he made by being on top is that he voluntarily let his belt go, he goes out on his own terms
     
  13. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    He'll be 38 next month so is clearly past his prime. He was talking about retirement before the Bute fight so it's been on his mind for a while and his motivation is clearly waning. He didn't prepare properly for Groves the 1st time which shows his focus isn't what it was, so it makes sense that he should retire.

    While he has only had 35 fights, since winning the title he's fought the best available and he's had some wars with Pascal, Groves and Kessler. His lack of defence has seen him take a lot of punches so it's surprising he hasn't declined faster than he already has.

    Calzaghe may have had more fights and a longer pro career but for most of it he was fighting very underwhelming opposition so wouldn't have as much wear and tear as Froch, his last fight was at the age of 36, so Froch is already older than Calzaghe when he retired.

    You can't really use Hopkins as a comparison what he's done is remarkable and almost unheard of.

    The money he earned against Groves the 2nd time definitely put him in a more comfortable position and he has more than enough to last the rest of his life and he has apparently invested his money wisely, so money probably isn't the motivator it once was.

    But I think the biggest reason for his retirement is his lack of hunger to fight on. He has beaten everyone that matters apart from Ward and he knows deep down he doesn't have what it takes to beat him.
     
  14. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    It's all been said.

    Froch has a family, he has money, he has the respect and admiration of millions, and a quality legacy on which to hang his hat.

    If he isn't feeling the desire to fight anymore, that is reason enough. The guy has met every challenge put in front of him, and fought thru a veritable gauntlet from 2008-2014.

    Nobody compares to Hopkins in terms of longevity. Calzaghe was never in the string of battles against quality opp that Froch was in.

    As someone else said, there are plenty of guys who have hung around for too many fights, if Froch chooses not to be one of them, then he is entitled.
     
    rorschach51 likes this.
  15. dannyc1990

    dannyc1990 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    111
    Apr 25, 2013
    boxers can't really win, goes out on top people say its too early... go out getting beat and they say it's too late.
     
    rorschach51 likes this.