Tunney wrote he had great difficulty hitting Dempsey on the button. He tucked his chin and was constantly moving his head.
Ed, Yes. In his three autobiographies, Dempsey said he was down several times and his brother, who was working as his second, stopped the fight too quickly. So who's word are you going to take, Dempsey's or someone else? Why is are there so many stories and excuses about his career, what happened in the ring, and who he did not fight? Dempsey might be telling a fib about being floored three times. Hard to say. Maybe he was embarrassed the whole thing with the count took 20 seconds. Shades of Jimmy Thunder vs Crawford Grimsley. Either way, the loss is a black mark on his record. I think most of us ( Not McVey ) see it this way. As for Dempsey's defense, he's rather hittable on film, and that's saying something since his opponents feared his power and he could beat just about anyone he fought to the punch.
To be factually correct, it took some time for the ref to pick up the count. We only saw three waves of his hand, yet six seconds have passed on you tube film and on anyone's watch from the exit of the ring to the entrance, so it was not just three seconds! Let's see if you can admit an easy mistake...you made more than one here so far in this thread alone. I would not put it past editing of the film to make Dempsey appear out of the ring less than he actually was either.
Tunney does not need to be alive, the films show he had his way with Dempsey and likely would have stopped him had the fight been 15 rounds as opposed to 10. I do not see Tunney missing often vs Dempsey, do you or anyone else here? Tunney won 19 of the 20 rounds in both fights, I tend to out he felt Dempsey hard to catch.
To be factually correct the title of the thread is highly contentious not to say unproven! Two autobiographies. If you think Dempsey losing to Flynn at that stage of his career is a black mark on his record why don't you have a vote on it and see who agrees with you?
Dempsey was back in the ring at the count of 3, and back on his feet at 4 not that it matters one iota. What would be the motive for shaving few seconds off Dempsey's time out of the ring? Sorry Rain Man your thread didn't go according to plan . "The best laid plans of Mice and Mendoza often go astray".
If the fight commentator himself who was there said that Dempsey was helped back into the ring-why do you insist on doubting it?
Yeah I do see Tunney missing often. In fact one of the most popular clips of Dempsey's defense is him slipping an 8 punch combo from Tunney. Tunney said himself that Dempsey was hard to hit. I guess you know more than Tunney now...
That's not what he himself said happened nor did the commentator describe it the way you WISH it had happened. Here at approx 3:00 of the video he is quoted as saying that if he had not been helped by newsreporters he would not have been able to make it back into the ring. This content is protected That constitutes a violation of rules requiring either a no contest or a loss. Had it happened to Dempsey in Argentina then the USA press would have called it unfair.
The commentator was added later. Since there was no provision for a boxer being outside the ring whether Dempsey was helped back in the ring or not isnt the crux of it ,what is important is did he get back before the final count was reached? The answer to which is yes ,with 6 seconds to spare!